On 2 May, 17:50, Eric Gisse wrote:
On May 2, 8:33 am, sean wrote:

[...]

1) Why are you replying to a post from 2004?
Im adding an extra link to that 2004 press release. The link..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QLSfmvFcLB8
Helps further explain the theoretical model outlined in that 2004
post . I find that most of you relativity crackpots are unable to
visualize simple concepts so hopefully this will help you understand
better, the real mechanism behind GRB`s.
I also wanted to draw attention to the fact that recent observations
have confirmed predictions made in the 2004 post and ruled out
predictions made by beamed theory from the same time. As you know the
real test of theory is confirmation by observation. By these rules
relativity and the standard model are the crank theories as their
predictions have been found to be incorrect whereas mine from 2004 are
confirmed.
But check the link as there are also simulations showing how
relativity is unable to even explain MMx and sagnac. Contrary to the
false information supplied at Ned Wrights site, and wikipedia among
others. Note that Neds ring sagnac illustration
wouldnt work for SR if he tried doing it in the source frame .
Sean
www.gammarayburst.com