On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 01:38:55 +0000 (UTC), bz
wrote:

HW@....(Henri Wilson) wrote in
:

That is central to the Riztian/Wilsonian theory of variable stars.

Yes...and if you can give me one good reason why a pulse of light
emitted six month after another from an accelerating source should be at
rest wrt the former then I would like to hear it.

I would like to hear it too.

By the way, 'extinction' requires that that happen. It just requires that
the later photons travel for some distance before they become 'stationary'
wrt earlier emitted light pulses. Right?

Yes, that is correct....and it follows that the shorter the period, the more
likely the two pulses travel through similar material in space. ...which is
good for my theory.

As far as under SR, no inertial FoR is allowed to move at c. Composition of
c with any other velocity gives c. From the photon's viewpoint, birth and
death are simultanious. Photons are not allowed to carry clocks, or the
clocks do not tick when photons carry them.

Yes, that's why I ignore Einstein's stupid theory altogether.



www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

Einstein's Relativity - the greatest HOAX since jesus christ's virgin mother.