"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
...
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:49:02 +0100, "OG" wrote:


"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 00:59:11 +0100, "OG"
wrote:


"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
m...
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:37:49 +0100, "OG"
wrote:


Run the bloody thing and see for yourself.
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/newvariables.exe


I don't play with unknown programs TYVM

Well go away troll...


Just answer the questions
- how many variables?
- do we see light curves for other 'line of sight' parameters?
- why does extinction only affect light travelling at particular
speeds?

It's your theory - support it if you can!

My dialogue with George has all the answers. READ IT

Don't you see that you just don't have a convincing and coherent basis
for
a
theory? You have one principle that you will stick to regardless of what
fudges and fiddles you have to add to the rest of the universe just to
make
the damn thing fit!

Even then you struggle to explain just 1 or 2 aspects of a Cepheid's
light
curve and you can't account for variability of velocity against
ionization
temperature.

You'll be OK now. You have Geesey onside.


I'll leave you in peace. You've clearly decided that you can't sustain an
argument on scientific grounds.

You haven't come up with any science.

2 points
Firstly, it's your theory that's under review
Secondly, science is to do with more than computer modelling and inventing
excuses when other observations don't match theory.