On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:41:12 -0600, Art Deco wrote:

Henri Wilson HW@....(Henri wrote:

On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:19:45 -0600, Art Deco wrote:

Leave Andro alone. He's not as stupid as some others here.

"Photons do not have wavelength"

I dare you to support this silly claim.

Note: Henri didn't even bother to try.


There was an obvious typo in my last message. 'c' should have been 'v'.

This is what I was asking:

The equations for gratings include 'wavelength' and not light speed or
'frequency'.

wavelength = c / frequency

What's 'frequency'?

Cycles per second of an oscillator or periodic phenomenon. Was that
so hard? Or have you never gone to the seashore and counted waves?

Have you counted light oscillations?

If a grating is used to inspect light coming from a star moving at
v towards us, then the diffracted angles are indicative of the relative speed
between the star and the grating.

If the grating is now moved away at 'v', why should those angles change?
Certainly the movement of the grating has not altered the light's wavelength
in
any way.

I smell a flaw in a theory somewhere.

What flaw?

F-L-A-W

So you can't specify anything. Didn't think so.

You can't answer the question...because you know nothing about physics at all.


www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

Einstein's Relativity - the greatest HOAX since jesus christ's virgin mother.