On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:37:49 +0100, "OG" wrote:


"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:01:21 +0100, "OG" wrote:


"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
...
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:33:08 +0100, "OG"
wrote:


"OG" wrote in message
...

still waiting Henry

Why are all relativists so bloody helpless?

how about using your own brain.

I don't have a problem with my own brain - I'm trying to fathom yours,
which
is why I ask you to explain what you mean when you claim something. Mostly
you seem to be confused about simple physical phenomena.

"Methods to Account for Interstellar Extinction"
Google, 170,000 hits.

I was asking about light speed unification. The '169,000 hits' refer to
extinction - the absorption of particular wavelengths of light, which
would
not explain why light at 'different speeds' but at nominally the same
wavelength would be selectively absorbed leaving just a single light
speed.

Also I asked how many variables in your software, nor whether we see light
curves representative of all possible 'line of sight' parameters.

Run the bloody thing and see for yourself.
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/newvariables.exe


I don't play with unknown programs TYVM

Well go away troll...


Just answer the questions
- how many variables?
- do we see light curves for other 'line of sight' parameters?
- why does extinction only affect light travelling at particular speeds?

It's your theory - support it if you can!

My dialogue with George has all the answers. READ IT


www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

Einstein's Relativity - the greatest HOAX since jesus christ's virgin mother.