On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:51:55 +0100, "George Dishman"
wrote:


"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
.. .
On 21 Apr 2007 05:23:50 -0700, George Dishman
wrote:
...
The mathematical community calls it "geometry".

Call it what you like George. It doesn't alter the fact that my demo shows
the
second postulate in action ....

No, the fact is that it does not show the second postulate,
is is only half a demonstration because if you finished it
you would prove me right.

You can't get out of it that way George.

We know light takes TIME to go from A to B.

When light is emitted from a star, no ultimate observer is involved.
Give me one physical reason why a light pulse emitted from one part of the
orbit should travel at the same speed as that emitted 3 months later from
another part.

If your answer is "a local EM reference frame exists around any large mass
centre", then you COULD have a point. ..but I wouldn't even be so sure of that.

George

www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

Einstein's Relativity - the greatest HOAX since jesus christ's virgin mother.