"H. Wabnig" .... .-- .- -... -. .. --. @ .- --- -. DOT .- - wrote in
message ...
On 9 Apr 2007 06:35:22 -0700, "mathematician"
wrote:
Hi,
I found one interesting article and abstract of which I copy below,
please take a look for your comments !!!
Best Regrads,
Hannu Poropudas
------------------------------------------------------------COPY
BELOW--------------------------------------------------------------------
In 1988, radiocarbon laboratories at Arizona, Cambridge, and Zurich
determined the age of a sample from
the Shroud of Turin.
They reported that the date of the cloth's production lay between A.D.
1260 and 1390 with 95%
confidence.
..............
so it is 600 years old, isn't that old enough for a museum piece?
did anyone really expect more?
w.
--
soc.culture.austria answering service
proposals and complaints to:
That's nothing. Last week the CSI crew tested the rock in front of the tomb
of JC, and found that it had the fingerprints of the twelve apostles on it,
it was sedimentary in nature,. from a massive sandstone formation in the
area, and another biblical story was an obvious fraud, as well. Since,
using scientific deductive reasoning, they proved that the twelve moved the
stone, removed the corpse and claimed resurrection.
One member of the CSI team had a theory that the twelve had actually
murdered JC and made the whole crucifixion thing up for the sake of the
story.
Now back to work on the movie "The Passion of Christy," starring a
surgically enhanced geologist . . . .