"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message ...
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 02:25:33 GMT, "Androcles"
wrote:


"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message ...
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 16:18:52 GMT, "Androcles"
wrote:

The thing is, our brightness curves are also the true velocity curves....or
they would be if only one star was contributing to the curves.

The luminosity is out of phase with velocity.

The phasing is far more complicated than you think..

Don't be so ****ing stupid. The phasing is more complicated than
*YOU* don't think, it isn't more complicated than *I* KNOW.

The phase of the maximum varies with distance becasue of the size of the delay
between pulse emissions.

ALL right...you fluked the wrong explanation....BUT YOU DIDN'T KNOW WHY..... AND STILL DON'T.




It stars out at exactly 90 ahead of the TRUE velocity and moves to a lesser
value with time. It also depends on the eccentricity of the orbit..

ALL wrong...you ****ed the wrong explanation....BUT YOU DON'T KNOW WHY..... AND STILL DON'T.


However the velocity that astronomers wrongly determine is exactly in phase
with the brightness curve. That's because they actually USE the brightness
curve to determine doppler shift.

****ing hopeless, ignorant tord.



Gawd, you **** me off sometimes, you think others are as ignorant
as you.

If you knew how to program properly you could see the effect yourself.

Arrogant pile of ignorant ****. **** off.
*plonk*