Thread: Mars salt ?
View Single Post
  #5  
Old March 18th 07, 05:12 PM posted to sci.space.history,sci.astro,sci.physics,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks
Art Deco[_6_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 796
Default Mars salt ?

wrote:

Now I'm getting more of those "GOOGLE server ERROR" messages, as
though I've broken their robo moderated Usenet server. Of course, my
PC is also being summarily nailed to death by all the usual spermware/
****ware they can muster, which might have a little something to do
with all the GOOGLE Usenet server down-time, and/or responsible for
most of those pesky server error messages that keep coming my way.
I'm also not the one that's topic/author stalking and otherwise
hijacking whatever off to those infomercial incest cesspools of
"alt.fan.art-bell" and "alt.usenet.kooks".


Still as clueless as ever.
-

As having been reported by "captain.": If Mars supposedly kicks Venus
butt, then where's all the required butt kicking Martian salt?

Earth has its rather significant salt deposits, plus our salty oceans,
and our moon is still losing its salt, and without salt there is no
intelligent life as we know it.

Because of Mars being so much larger and otherwise more gravity
substantial than our moon, as well as for being so much further away
from the IR solar energy, and for otherwise having that mostly CO2
surrounding atmosphere means that whatever Mars salt existed as of a
billion years ago must still exist. This has to be the case unless
the origin of Mars is somehow different than the origin of Earth,
that's different again than our moon, and still different once again
than what's represented by the relatively newish planetology of Venus.

If Mars were ever alive and kicking with whatever life, as such that
salt of said life has to be there, doesn't it?

Salt can't possibly hide, nor is salt a difficult element to detect.
If salts were sufficiently heated, as they are upon our naked moon
that's supposedly more of a vacuum environment than not, as such these
salts unavoidably boil off and subsequently become easily detected via
optical/CCD or of even by way of good old Kodak film methods of taking
such observations seriously to task. Our moon is in fact still losing
sodium at perhaps 25 micrograms/m2/day, which means that our moon is
still the salty orb that likely deposited much of our terrestrial
salt, that which makes us what we are.

Much like an environment without diatoms, as well as if going without
salt means that evolved intelligent life, as well as most other forms
of life as we know it, simply wouldn't exist.


See above. Why are you obsessed with "salt", Brad?

--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco

"To err is human, to cover it up is Weasel" -- Dogbert