On 16 Mar 2007 00:53:29 -0700, "George Dishman"
wrote:

On 16 Mar, 02:33, HW@....(Henri Wilson) wrote:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 00:18:00 -0000, "George Dishman" wrote:
"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
.. .

It SHOULD include it but if as you say above your program
does not take this into account, that could explain why it
is missing the VDoppler effect.

I'm working on it. I'll eventually find what's happening.
...
It will be done....but it isn't as simple as one would think.

I can see that your approach might make it tricky. Let
me know when you crack it.

George

See http://www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/bunching.jpg

This shows how the phase of the TRUE velocity maximum changes with distance
when compared with the maximum bunching. The latter (maximum pulse arrival
rate) is wrongly assumed to indicate the maximum doppler shift.

I think this answers your questions George.

The standard doppler approach applied to pulse arrival rate gives a completely
wrong answer.


"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know
him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
--Jonathan Swift.