View Single Post
  #5  
Old March 5th 07, 04:23 PM posted to sci.physics,uk.sci.astronomy
Sue...
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 237
Default Is the moon is losing time?

On Mar 5, 10:03 am, "Brad Guth" wrote:
"Sue..." wrote in message

oups.com

On Mar 5, 3:50 am, "Brad Guth" wrote:
[...]


Too bad we're still not quite smart enough for having established any
viable form of interactive science platform within our moon's L1.
Perhaps China or India can help us out, although Germany should be right
next in line as to taking over some station-keeping control, as to their
squatting within a portion of our moon's L1, and for holding on to it
(with force if need be).


Try Japan:
http://www.research.ibm.com/grape/grape_mdgrape2.htm


Sue...


Thanks much, as I'll try contacting Bruce Elmegreen at the IBM Watson
Research Center for this help, of processing such complex orbital
mecanics.

Those 2560 MD-GRAPE2 chips running at an additional 50 Teraflops should
more than accomplish the task. Of course, that performance was reported
way back in the CPU dark ages of the year 2000, as such it should be
worth at least ten fold if not 100 fold better by now.

However, if the ongoing IBM Research in Tokyo (mgr. Shigenori Shimizu),
in collaboration with Dr. Ebisuzaki at the Institute of Physical and
Chemical Research (RIKEN) isn't interested, then what?


You might want to use Google and see how many similar
simulations have already run.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&s...&btn G=Search

If it over a hundred then you'll have a pretty good idea why
they aren't intrested.

However, don't do anything brash like that before you ask.
I just tried it and smoke started billowing out of my computer.

)

Sue...




-
Brad Guth

--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server -http://www.Mailgate.ORG