"Phineas T Puddleduck" wrote in message
news

. . . What is the size of the constituent particles of the
fluid,

Oh they must be friggin' hewwwwmongus! g

Good question, actually, Phineas. As we are
postulating an energy that has wavelengths that
could be shorter even than the Planck length, we
must also attest to the great amount of energy
this implies, as well as to the extremely marked
corpuscular nature of "the fluid".

Since "bigger than a breadbox" will probably not
do it for you, then consider that "space-as-field"
comes off as a void nothingness to our senses.
Scientists look for the "graviton" and cannot find
it yet. Perhaps when they do find it, you will have
your answer to this question.

My guess is that it's a very dense material of very
tiny but energy-packed(!) photon-like quanta, and
their negative, deleterious and pernicious side
effects on budding astrophysicists are nothing
short of extraordinary! g

and how does this relate to Heisenberg?

....on him too!

happy days and...
starry starry nights!

--
ASTRO WARS!... May the FIELD be with you.

Indelibly yours,
Paine
http://www.savethechildren.org/
http://www.painellsworth.net