On Feb 23, 9:34 am, bz wrote:
HW@....(Henri Wilson) wrote :
Bob, the only so called evidence AGAINST the BaTh was De Sitter's work.
We know now why that is wrong.

Incorrect. There is a LOT more evidence against BaTh.

http://www.mpe.mpg.de/ir/GC/index.php

That is not the text that appears on that main
index page. I suspect you found this paper on a link
somewhere on that page, but that it was in a frame
so the URL displayed still showed the main page.

However, I found the paper you quoted he

http://www.asa3.org/aSA/PSCF/1988/PSCF3-88Phillips.html

- Randy