On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:37:12 +0000 (UTC), bz
wrote:

HW@....(Henri Wilson) wrote in
:



You must play by the rules of the game.
Everything must be consistent with c'=c+v. You must deal with all the
implications, you can not pick and choose which you want to deal with.

Rubbish

Rubbish?

How can you pick and choose effects while ignoring other predictable
effects and claim to be a follower of science, as describe it in your book?

Bob, the only so called evidence AGAINST the BaTh was De Sitter's work.
We know now why that is wrong.


--
bz

please pardon my infinite ignorance, the set-of-things-I-do-not-know is an
infinite set.