"Brad Guth" wrote in message
news:e626d95e662304049678612ff9b50a94.49644@mygate .mailgate.org

In addition to all that's clean and essentially renewable as to the
evengy existing between Earth and our moon (2e20 joules or better),
whereas those 40% efficient PVs are just another ongoing example of
where we should be focused as of decades ago, as to achieving a cleaner
and less bloody future, at the same time accomplishing as best we can
manage to salvage whatever's left of our badly failing environment.

This following energy alternative topic offers us yet another good
example as to why 99.9% of Usenet summarily sucks and blows, as well as
to why yourself and others of your kind are being continually sucked
under and summarily snookered into being dumbfounded past the point of
no return, by such a naysay Usenet mindset of infomercial spewing
buttologests, as orchestrated by those in charge that want absolutely
nothing to do with sharing the truth.

Solar, not nuclear

http://mygate.mailgate.org/mynews/sc...ma ilgate.org

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.e...8534ad3fe35aa2

This green/renewable energy topic and of others similar are well worth
our sharing and accomplishing something constructive on behalf of
humanity and that of salvaging our badly failing environment at the same
time, whereas instead these butt-ugly loads of mainstream infomercial
spewing damage control borgs, acting on behalf of their Old Testament
big-energy and of their bigger puppet government(s) that are clearly
owned by big-energy, are into pulling out all of their infomercial
spewing stops of feeding us disinformation.

Solar and wind derived energy is perfectly doable at an honest to God
density of 37.5 kw/m2, as per given surface footprint. That's roughly
100 fold better birth to grave footprint energy density than nuclear,
and at the same time hardly representing squat worth of anything that's
toxic nor much less radioactive, and that's not via some weird village
idiot saying that we can do entirely without nuclear picking up at least
5% of our global energy needs (at least not until He3/fusion gets the
big-energy green light so that the Exxon's and those tricky ENRONs can
proceed to pillage, plunder and rape humanity plus that of mother Earth
for all she's worth).

At nearly 85e9 oily barrels/day doesn't even include the horrific
volumes of natural gas or the km3 of coal reserves being consumed per
day, nor is it including the amounts of energy taken for extracting and
getting all of that raw energy into pipe lines or various storage
facilities that are nearly countless, and not all is without leakage or
having contributed much worse happenings per year.

Surplus clean energy as easily derived from solar and wind can be put
directly into products, such as into producing those new and improved
PVs, or into clean chemicals or raw elements of energy storage products
such as LH2 or H2O2. With such spare energy and secondary products to
burn (sort of speak, w/o NOx to boot), all sorts of nifty things become
affordable and basically doable, therefore insuring jobs and a bright
less-polluting future that'll eventually have little if anything to do
with those nasty fossil fuel alternatives, thus avoiding the associated
takings of good and bad blood that's involved.
-
Brad Guth


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG