SpaceBanter.com - View Single Post

**Double-A[_1_]**

wrote:
Art Deco wrote:
wrote:

Art Deco wrote:
wrote:

Double-A wrote:
Warhol wrote:
Oh no! You mean that evern the House of Saud is Jewish?!!

Maybe Tom Potter is right! They're everywhere!

It is sad to see that Double-A again,
exposes his serious reading comprehension problem.

Hi, Crackpotter!

As can be seen from doing a Google search on "Tom Potter",
my position is that Jews are a small percentage of mankind,
and that a smaller subset of Jews are active in
instigating and profiting from conflict and war.

For example, note that Jews were active in
instigating and profiting from the Russian Revolution,
and that after Jews massacred the Russian Royal Family,
and co-opted the Russian government,
they used Russia as a base from where to instigate
the Religious Wars of the 1900's.

Also note that after the Native Russians
regained controlled of their government,
(A work in process, as can be seen from the
fact that Israel, England and America
are harboring several Jewish Criminals
who are actively trying to destabilize Russia
and retake the Russian government.)

many of the class war instigators
who had held high positions in Russia,
migrated to Israel and America,
from where they are instigating the Religious Wars of the 2000's
to get back in the chips, as the loot from their Class Wars is almost
gone.
(German reparations, numerous holocaust scams, numerous
claims on the assets of other nations, companies, banks, and private
citizens, etc.)

It appears that the following pattern has repeated itself many times.

1. Jews come into conflict with their neighbors.

2. They migrate en-mass to a rich nation,
pool their assets and buy a few of the nation's leaders
to promote their agenda.

3.They use their bought leaders to affect their agenda
of tapping into the wealth of their new host nation,
and instigating conflict between their new host,
and their previous neighbors, as a means of
siphoning off wealth from their previous neighbors,
and to creates conflicts that they can profit from
by virtue of their knowledge of both nations.

4. At some point, the natives of their host nation
become fed up with the fact that some of their leaders
are selling out to the Jews, and the natives begin to
rebel against those leaders and the Jews.

5. At which point, the Jews migrate to a new
host nation, and the pattern repeats.

It appears that Jews are coming into conflict with
loyal Americans, and that they are beginning to such up
to China, whom they seem to have targeted as their next host/victim.

If the pattern repeats,
during the next decade or so, Jews will begin to
migrate en-mass to China, and after they buy a few leaders,
they will begin to tap into the Chinese wealth, and
to instigate conflict between China and America.

The question is,
what cause Jews to come into conflict with
all of their neighbors through history?
((Mesopotamia, Palestine, Egypt, Palestine, Persia, Rome, Spain,
England, France, Spain again Germany, recently Russia and Palestine
again,
and in the process, America.)

It may be the fact that their children
are systematically and aggressively brainwashed
to put race and religion above any fixed set of moral values,
and above the interests of their neighbors.

It may be that this chain of events will soon end,
because Jews have come into conflict with almost all of the
peoples on the Earth, and the last nations they can migrate en-mass to
are China and India, and I dare say that the Chinese are far too clever
to
allow Jews to infiltrate and co-opt their government,
and that the Chinese will accept all wealth that
Jews can funnel into China as they leave America, Russia and Europe,
(And even Israel.)
but that they will execute any Chinese leaders
that compromise the integrity of China's government.

In other words, Jews are NOT "everywhere"
as Double-A seems to think,
but you can rest assured that where they are,
they will be buying leaders,
siphoning off the wealth of the nation,
instigating conflict and war,
and coming into conflict with their neighbors.

Thanks to Double-A for bringing up this important issue,
even though he does not comprend the issue or my
views on the issue.

I never knew you were into bigoted, racial kookrants, Crackpotter. You
and Warhol should hook up.

As a true seeker of wisdom and truth,
I am always anxious for my misconceptions to be exposed,
as when they are, my perception of reality becomes more accurate.

"Arguing with kooks is pointless." -- a wise person posting to usenet.

Here is an interesting correlation that I have observed
in the media, in politics, and in the news groups:

When someone cannot address a message with facts and logic,
they usually try to obscure the message
by attacking the messenger,
and trying to make them the issue.

It will be interesting to see if the poster
has the intelligence and knowledge to address the message,
or if she will be forced to run away,
or use the tactic most common to losers.

I will be looking forward to seeing the poster
demonstrate her knowledge of history and current events.
and show where my assertions and correlations
are in error, as I am most anxious to improve
the accuracy of my perceptions.

What do you think the poster will do?

My money says she will come up with a one liner
the focuses on the messenger,
rather than the message.

Afraid to post your diatribes to AUK, Crackpotter?

As I wrote:
"It will be interesting to see if the poster
has the intelligence and knowledge to address the message,
or if she will be forced to run away,
or use the tactic most common to losers.

I will be looking forward to seeing the poster
demonstrate her knowledge of history and current events.
and show where my assertions and correlations
are in error, as I am most anxious to improve
the accuracy of my perceptions.

What do you think the poster will do?

My money says she will come up with a one liner
the focuses on the messenger,
rather than the message."

As can be seen,
I am right as usual.

But the silly lady is right about one thing.
I prefer not to mud wrestle with pigs,
because it is a waste of time, and
as my pappy used to say:

"Don't mud wrestle with a pig
because you both get muddy,
and pigs like mud."

--
Tom Potter

Tom, I've heard Art Deco accused of many things, but never of being a
lady!

Haha!

Double-A