Oh No wrote:


3. I note that you, also, fail to mention anything about the 5
analogies that I keep referring to (see post #2 in this thread,
11/06/06). Do these empirical, as in well-observed, phenomena have any
educational value? Do you ignore them because they are incorrect? Or do
you ignore them because they support my argument?

To be honest, I ignore them because they are in a long forgotten post
which I am not going to go to the trouble of finding.


The material I was referring to (5 very interesting analogies between
hadrons and K-N black holes) can be accessed in about 10 seconds and
read in about 30 seconds. Of course one would want to think about these
empirical facts for a bit longer, but as scientists, we like to think
about things like this.

Since this material would seem to have a definite bearing on the issue
of whether or not a general analogy between hadrons and Kerr-Newman
black holes might be useful (even if only an approximation), I am
surprised that both you and Steve Carlip ignore these potential
empirical clues.

RLO