View Single Post
  #5  
Old January 19th 07, 02:28 AM posted to sci.space.history,sci.space.policy
Jonathan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 428
Default debate on Apollo value -- worth entering this site?


"Jim Oberg" wrote in message
...
Check out
http://www.opendemocracy.net/democra...olicy_4246.jsp


I've read his latest book, it's one smarmy snear from one end to the

other,
and will try to get around to a review one of these days...



Ya know, some people complain and criticize
because they care alot about the issue.
They want it better than it is. Or have high
expectations that aren't being met. Maybe
they feel let-down or disillusioned etc.

And some people remain quiet, they go along, accept
...whatever, are complacent and agreeable to anything
and everything about that issue regardless of
what is being done or not. Because they don't care
all that much. OK is good enough for them.

Or maybe the space journalism business is such
that critics are black-listed, and going along
gets the story. I'm starting to wonder if going
along isn't good enough anymore, but a space
journalist needs to double as PR agent to
stay an insider.


Hmm, three choices......

http://www.hamienet.com/12659.mid



s