"John Maxson" wrote:

Scott M. Kozel wrote

You engaged in creative snipping, ignored my questions,
and merely reposted the alleged missive!

?

You engaged in creative snipping, ignored my questions,
and merely reposted the alleged missive.

What is this alleged missive, and where did it come from,
and can you verify its existence?

Self-explanatory.

No it is not. All we know is that you posted something on Usenet, that
looks like some sort of acknowledgment by an outside party, of your
"booster crossing" theory.

What is this alleged missive, and where did it come from,
and can you verify its existence?

We need an explanation of what this is, and the context.
Is it part of a larger report or missive? Does is represent
the opinion of A. Ernest Fitzgerald, or did he catalog the
opinion of someone else who sent the theory to him?

Self-explanatory.

Non-responsive.

We need an explanation of what this is, and the context.

Is it part of a larger report or missive?

Does is represent the opinion of A. Ernest Fitzgerald, or did he catalog
the opinion of someone else who sent the theory to him?

I think that John Maxson needs to answer some hard
questions about this alleged missive, and that until he
does that, the alleged missive should be disregarded as
without substantiation.

You *think*? Any proof of that?

You're the one with the allegations. You're the one who needs to
prove. If you're going to raise serious allegations, then bar of proof
is high.


..