"Ron Miller" wrote in message
oups.com

Oh, great...two pseudoscientists patting each other on the back because
a third pseudoscientist supports their beliefs...

Science that's replicated is good enough for me. Obviously you'll
accept upon absolutely anything that's NASA/Apollo scripted into your
little black book of infomercial-science and downright lies, that
matches your little black remorseless heart.

It looks as though we're being silly boys again, arnt we. Once again
there's born-again liars and then there's borgs or rather brown-nosed
minions of the status quo that simply can't tell one lie from another.

A whole lotta liars

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.e...31269616317291
"zzpat" wrote in message

All this lying in the animal kingdom reminds me of Fox News. It's too
bad Fox doesn't have "fair and balanced" stories from two crustaceans;
one lying his ass off and being praised, the other telling the truth and
being vilified.

I say that loot talks, doesn't it. But do these serious cults (aka
Skull and Bones or Old Testament whatevers) even care about loot nearly
as much as they do about sustaining their seat of power?

If a badly given anti-ruse is worth doing, you either do it at whatever
the cost or simply allow it to transpire by way of others. What's new
about orchestrated disinformation wars; isn't it what we do best?

Planting phony-baloney information (good or bad news) as supposed
evidence is certainly a good part of any half-assed plan of action,
isn't it.

Creating those supposed facts as newly uncovered or discovered evidence,
and if need be contributing whatever moles that you can rather easily
tear apart, is pretty much status quo of achieving whatever it takes in
order to win a given info war, even if it's a mutually perpetrated and
extremely spendy and unavoidably lethal cold-war that goes on and on for
decades.

Remember, in war there are no rules.
-
Brad Guth


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG