wrote in message
...
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:15:05 GMT, "TeaTime"
wrote:
The solar cycle is a striking evidence for this theory. Every 11 years
the sun is changing the direction of its dipole magnetic field. The
current solar model assume incorrectly that the change of the magnetic
fields is coming from inside the sun, but it is not, it is coming from
the galactic center and it supply energy that heat the sun.

Agreed, the complete solar cycle of 22 years is evidence of a regular
inversion of the sun's magnetic field. The behaviour of sunspots around and
away from the solar maxima is evidence of the presence of a strong magnetic
field. The precise mechanism for generating the field and causing it to
alternate is not fully understood but is due to very dynamic processes
within the sun itself. No doubt the same Coriolis forces which create
natural circulating currents in the atmosphere of the planets also exist
within stars too. The sun is rotating every 27 days (at the solar equator
at least), so why not.

Sgr A, a supposed black hole at the galactic centre, is estimated to be some
2.6 billion solar masses. There are no doubt intense magnetic fields in
that region caused by the infall of dust and gas and accretion/ionisation in
the surrounding disk, as suggested by the 'snake' flux tubes which are
observed around there. However, the galactic centre is roughly 26,000
light years away. How do you propose that a magnetic flux of sufficient
intensity and rate of oscillation as to bring about fusion reactions can act
at so great a distance? If such were the case, we would not be living on a
habitable planet for one thing. Where is evidence of this incredible
universal magnetic flux? The magnetic fields of sun and major planets far
exceeds any from much more distant sources and they are merely byproducts of
local reactions of extreme magnitude.

The Earth's magnetic poles are also known to reverse every so often (and in
the time of dinosaurs, at an estimated 2.5 gauss, it was 80% stronger than
it is now).