"Max Keon" wrote in message ...
| This post is stored along with the images at
| http://www.optusnet.com.au/~maxkeon/pionomor.html
| --------------------------
|
| Pioneer Anomaly Anomalous No More.
|
| The story unfolds as a direct consequence of a universe which
| came into being from absolutely nothing,
| http://www.optusnet.com.au/~maxkeon/the1-1a.html a zero origin
| universe in fact. In that universe, light doesn't actually
| propagate anywhere, but it does move relative to a base that is
| set by the combined input from all local matter, anywhere, i.e.
| the Earth. According to the laws of that universe, the entire
| dimension surrounding every bit of matter in the universe is
| shifting inward into its own gravity well at the rate of
| (G*M/r^2)*2 meters in each second and is updated at the speed of
| light. Meaning that its acceleration capability diminishes to
| zero for anything moving at light speed toward its center of
| mass. The shift rate of dimension is necessarily twice the shift
| rate of the matter that the moving dimension carries along with
| it, otherwise there would be no driving mechanism available to
| perform the task.
|
| The equation representing an upward moving mass relative to a
| gravity source is ((c+v)^2/c^2)^.5*G*M/r^2-(G*M/r^2), while
| ((c-v)^2/c^2)^.5*G*M/r^2-(G*M/r^2) represents a downward moving
| mass. Even matter in a fixed position relative to a gravity
| source is traveling outward through dimension because dimension
| is traveling inward through it, hence the action of gravity.
|
| Another consequence of the velocity related gravity anisotropy
| is that any motion anywhere in the universe is going to be
| affected by every bit of matter in the universe to some degree.
| While matter is fixed with the local base of dimension it's not
| traveling anywhere relative to the universe, but as soon as it
| moves, it's moving into an all pervasive wall of resistance that
| is forever present in the direction of relative motion. The
| moving matter will be slowed in the direction of motion according
| to a combination of the two equations.
|
| Assuming that Mercury has just arrived at its average orbit
| radius and is traveling at 48000m/sec around a circular orbit
| path, these are the numbers for the universe generated
| anisotropy; ((c+v)^2/c^2)^.5*G*M/r^2-(G*M/r^2) : v=48000:
| G=6.67E-11: M=300000: r=1. 300000kg of matter at 1 meter radius
| is the same ratio as taking the mass of all matter in the visible
| universe in the direction of relative motion (3.45E+53kg), at its
| respective radii, and then combining them. It gives a slowing
| rate for Mercury's orbit velocity of 3.19E-9 meters in each
| second.
|
| http://www.optusnet.com.au/~maxkeon/piondat.html This 600k
| byte data file was generated from calculating the input to the
| anisotropy from the universe where the effective mass of the
| universe in the direction of relative motion is integrated over
| 3988 equally spaced 1 MPc steps, right back to where the
| universe disappears from view. The mass housed in each step is
| reduced until it becomes zero for the final step at the 13
| billion light year distance.
|
| The shell widths remain constant only from our viewpoint. Due to
| the expansion (in the big bang universe) the shell widths are in
| fact becoming increasingly narrow per distance. If they were made
| to expand along with the expansion, each shell would contain
| exactly the same amount of matter because the expansion is not
| just along the line to the edge of the visible universe, it's 3D.
| But the number of shells would be significantly reduced.
|
| The first step is the most significant, contributing more than
| half that from the entire universe. Matter is least homogeneously
| distributed within that step. But it's not a concern if the
| anisotropy isn't generated isotropically throughout an orbit
| cycle anyway. Even so, the contributions from Andromeda and the
| Alpha Centauri group don't contribute significantly to the
| gravity anisotropy, and they would represent the most significant
| local influence.
|
| Mercury's motion relative to the mass of the universe sets up a
| wall of resistance which shortens its travel distance by 3.19E-9
| meters in 1 second. But there is no physical link between the
| moving Mercury and the matter of the universe where the missing
| distance can be justified. It's not possible for the matter of
| the universe to shift to accommodate any change in momentum over
| the time span of Mercury's orbit. The only means of transferring
| energy in that direction is through gravitational radiation,
| which is nowhere near up to the task. So it must be accounted
| for locally.
|
| If during the 1 second (48000 - 3.19E-9) meter journey along the
| orbit path, Mercury is deflected by 3.19E-9 meters, squarely
| across the invisible face of the perpetual wall of resistance,
| initiated to point toward the Sun by its curved orbit path, the
| addition of the distance traveled in the two planes is still
| 48000 meters.
|
| The obvious reaction to that claim is that Mercury's actual travel
| distance is a^2+b^2=c^2 = sqr((48000 - 3.19E-9)^2 + 3.19E-9^2)
| which is virtually unaltered from the shortened but undeflected
| path. The problem is that the simple linear measurements that
| apply in the realm of matter don't apply in the 3D realm of
| gravity. All measurements in that realm must necessarily include
| the three dimension which are perpendicular to each other.
| Mercury moves (48000 - 3.19E-9) meters in 1 second through two
| planes of dimension. And it's deflected by 3.19E-9 meters toward
| the Sun in two planes of dimension. The equation for the triangle
| becomes a+b=c. The lengths are already squared.
|
| Mercury's fall to the Sun will be halted when centrifugal forces
| overcome the inward driving force generated by the anisotropy.
| Mercury would then just cycle around within the background
| universe as if it was housed at the center of some gigantic
| elastic web.
|
| http://www.optusnet.com.au/~maxkeon/merc-un.gif The set of
| oscillating rings that reduce in oscillation magnitude per
| distance from the orbiting Mercury (red circle), depict how
| Mercury's motion will oscillate around within the background
| universe. The scale is far from accurate. It's very compressed
| toward the outer edge. Over each 88 day orbit cycle, one
| compression-rarefaction wave will be sent off throughout the
| plane of the orbit, into the universe. There will be around 18
| of them between here and our nearest neighbor. The force in the
| anisotropy generated by the universe is obviously very flexible
| over the time span of Mercury's orbit. There is virtually no
| direct link between Mercury and any part of the universe.
|
| The black line through the orbit axis is the perpetual wall of
| resistance from the universe generated gravity anisotropy. But
| over the time span of Mercury's orbit cycle, that can be of very
| little consequence.
|
| When Mercury finally arrives at a stable orbit radius, it is
| orbiting faster than would be expected from simple Newtonian
| gravity. i.e. The Sun is less massive than we think it is. If
| the mass of the Sun is .999978 of the presumed value, which
| camouflages the Pioneer anomaly for the close to the Sun
| case, Mercury would be traveling a 627 kilometer longer orbit
| radius than it should be for its velocity. It's moving at the
| correct rate for the more massive Sun, but is faster than it
| should be for the true Sun's mass.
|
| The universe generated gravity anisotropy doesn't end at Mercury
| of course, it extends throughout the universe. The fact that
| centrifugal forces between a galaxy center and the stars in its
| outer region alter according to 1/r instead of 1/r^2 is an
| excellent indication that a gravity anisotropy is present.
|
| The anisotropy drives the star inward toward the galaxy center,
| until centrifugal forces build to counteract the fall. The
| anisotropy is directly proportional to velocity, while the
| centrifugal force alters according to v^2, thus the fall is
| halted. The star will now be traveling faster than it should be
| for the orbit radius. There is obviously a good reason why it
| stops falling where it does.
| -------------------------
|
| Pioneer
|
| The Sun is only the catalyst which initiates Pioneer's
| deflection direction. The Universe alone is responsible for the
| anomalous acceleration which appears to be directed toward the
| Sun.
|
| ((c+v)^2/c^2)^.5 * (G*M/r^2) - (G*M/r^2) = 8.34E-10 m/sec^2.
| is the Pioneer anomaly for 12500m/sec velocity, which would be
| expected to be fairly constant right up to the Sun if the same
| velocity was maintained. This graph was generated using the
| lighter Sun (1.989957E+30kg).
|
| http://www.optusnet.com.au/~maxkeon/pioneer1.jpg
|
| The next graph was generated using the more massive Sun
| (1.99E+30kg), which partly conceals the combined Sun and universe
| generated anisotropies nearer to the Sun. But it's obviously not
| possible to conceal them both for all distances.
|
| http://www.optusnet.com.au/~maxkeon/pioneer2.jpg
|
| The Sun's gravity error at a radius of 20AU from the Sun is
| GM/r^2 for a Sun mass of 1.99E30 minus GM/r^2 for a Sun mass of
| 1.989957E+30 = 3.19E-10m/sec^2. Each graph is reduced by that
| amount at that radius. And so on for the rest of each curve.
|
| Pioneer 10 is following a path which is close to 11 degrees off
| a line through the Sun, and its velocity is slowed by 8.4E-10
| m/sec^2 along that line, while it's also being deflected at that
| same rate perpendicular to that line. Pioneer's trajectory is
| curving toward the Sun at the rate of TAN-1(8.4E-10 / 12500)
| = 3.85e-12 degrees per second, or 1.214e-4 degrees per year.
| The combination of those two trajectory changes is going to look
| very much like a direct fall to the Sun.
|
| -----
|
| Max Keon

There never was any anomaly.
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/PoR/PoR.htm