Raving wrote:
Double-A wrote:
Raving wrote:
Double-A wrote:
G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
I have posted it takes 6 trillion Suns to create a mass great
enough,and dense enough for the explosion of a black hole and release
its singularity into the cosmos. I relate this great
mass density by theorizing it to 10^80 grams per cubic centimeter.
That's is "1" followed by eighty zeros) Best to keep in mind to compare
this with the density of water which is "1 gram per cubic centimeter.
Having this information makes for good science during the first
trillionth of a second of a big bang Bert


Bert, inside a theoretical black hole, time effectively stands still,
so how can an explosion ever happen there?
Bert and Double-A, I would suppose it means that one would have a heck
of a large singularity!

Think about that for a moment.

My singularity is bigger than your singularity, Bert.

Cordially,

Raving


Raving,

The singularity is theorized to be a very small object at the very
center of a theoretical black hole. The event horizon can be large,
but that is just the spherical boundary at the distance from the
singularity where the escape velocity becomes greater than the speed of
light. This distance called the Schwarzschild radius is interesting to
contemplate in that GR predicts that space would become so contracted
inside a black hole that the actual radius would be much greater than
the circumference divided by 2pi. This is how speculation arises that
a whole other universe could exist inside a black hole. I would think
that the Schwarzschild radius would have to be considered a radius
projected onto flat space. It might be more realistic to talk about a
Schwarzschild circumference.
Oh, there is a problem, Double-A.

Um ... At the center of the black hole, all the gravitational forces
are pulling one away from the center.

Tempus fugit.


Kerr did calculate that the ring singularity was repulsive.

Double-A