Thread
:
A Revised Planck Scale?
View Single Post
#
30
November 15th 06, 10:07 AM posted to sci.astro.research
[email protected]
external usenet poster
Posts: 96
A Revised Planck Scale?
wrote:
wrote:
George Dishman wrote:
.... Your theory is disproven
by the fact that I can stand up.
Let me clarify that point, it doesn't matter what units your observers
use, if you say the physical Schwarzschild radius of a proton, then
the surface gravity of the Earth will increase too and it doesn't
matter
whether that is expressed in m/s^2 or furlongs/fortnight^2, a factor of
10^38 increase will reduce me to a monatomic layer.
Sigh. Consider one hydrogen that is separated as far as possible from
any object or interaction. Inside that atomic scale system G(n-1)
applies. Outside of that system G applies, so long as you remain within
a stellar scale system.
Then contrary to what you said, you are discarding
the Schwarzschild metric which determines how the
effects change with scale.
That is what the Discrete Fractal paradigm
says. Are you in or out?
Since Steve Carlip has pointed out that we can already
measure the proton at scales three orders of magnitude
smalller than your values for its event horizon, your
suggestion is already proven wrong. Count me out of
your ideas.
George
[email protected]
View Public Profile
View message headers
Find all posts by
[email protected]
Find all threads started by
[email protected]