Oldest Light in the Universe or How about the newest Light??
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message
...
I'm thinking in our galaxy of billions of stars,and still much hydrogen
helium clouds we should see a new star being born once a week(or more)
Why not? Are they being born and the cloud is blocking out their light?
Is the cloud not dense enough? Is the cloud waiting for a shock wave of
heavy elements from a supernova blast? Less dust means less planets.
less dust might mean less stars Could the first blast that took place
the moment fusion started blasted the stars heavy elements into
space,and left most on the stars surface be the answer why our Sun has
iron . Could this iron be locked in the layer of the Sun's "convection
zone?" Could heavy elements create the surface's granular appearance(I
have a picture of the Sun's surface as I type this. Iron makes for
charge particles Sun spots are charge particles Hmmmm So I'll
theorize that the first two layers of the Sun its "photosphere" and its
"Convective" zone hold the iron of the Sun. Outward force and heavy
elements are balanced in these outer layers of the Sun.. This thought
just jumped in Iron's charged particles show they exist by producing
two mass ejections on opposite sides of the Sun,and thus sending charged
particles into space. Funny once our thinking gets started it
can go on an on. The Sun gave us life so it could see itself Bert
BeeertBrain, before you make a complete ass of yourself, go out and purchase
this month's Scientific American. It will, hopefully (if you can read), put
your "iron on the outside of the Sun" theory to rest. By the same token, it
will enlighten you on other aspects of star formation and progression to
their final demise, things about which you seem to be totally clueless.
|