House Defense Appropriations recommends SBR cut
Allen Thomson wrote:
IMO, this will be a mistake if it goes through -- SBR seems
like a system well worth having, though not cheap. The $30G
figure given below is a number that, AFAIK, hasn't come up
before; it's about what FIA is expected to cost, maybe a
little more. Also, what technologies are currently lacking
for SBR?
Its more like it is a major piece of ever-hapenning failures,
feet-dragging and cost overruns. It looks like people have got
fed off with non-working prototypes being called 'ready to
use technology'
A pity. Militray throwing money away on non-working toys is
always so much better than it being spent on stuff that blows
people up.
--
Sander
+++ Out of cheese error +++
|