Earth may be soon enough be w/o magnetosphere, but it also wasn't all
that long ago as being w/o Moon.

This new and improved syntax and a few pesky word improvements hasn't
change a darn thing, as otherwise it's the same old regular laws of
physics, of replicated science and associated old stories of Earth with
sufficiently artistic and intelligent souls from within our last ice
age, but w/o moon.

Not that anyone within this typically naysay Usenet from hell's
anti-think-tank that seriously sucks and blows actually gives an honest
tinker's damn, other than sharing as much of their infomercial-science
and infomercial-history as possible; Here's some of my old links of
information and short stories by others that's much the same as our NASA
loosing those 700 boxes of there own Apollo data, whereas instead our
planetology and historical archives thereof having also lost track of
records depicting the earliest existence of our moon, and that's without
my having involved Velikovsky's "Worlds in Collision" nor having
extracted from any other portions of his research and subsequent
writings.

Immanuel Velikovsky (banished for his being honest)
http://www.firmament-chaos.com/recent_papers.html
http://www.firmament-chaos.com/papers/fvenuspaper.pdf

Oldest petroglyphics(pecked art) of our moon? (not actually very old,
unless you'd consider that which had transpired since 10,500 BC as being
sufficiently classified as astronomically old), and to think that
12,000~15,000 years isn't hardly a drop in the evolutionary bucket of
our supposed intelligent life as we know it.

Where's our moon as of whatever's older than 10,500 BC, and especially
of anything that's 12,000 or forbid 15,000+ BC is entirely without moon
via such early depictions that's in any way is remotely suggestive of
being moon like. Yet those were artistically intelligent humans with
terrific cognitive skills as good as if not better then myself, that had
obviously been surviving for thousands of years prior to 15,000 BC (were
they all a species of blind souls, or were they simply afraid to go
outside their caves by night or even by day?)

Was there an early evolutionary glitch in humanity's ability, that would
have somehow prevented their depicting our moon? Or, was Earth's
environment of such a thick and dense atmosphere that was continually
clouded over and thereby masking the sun, our moon and stars as being
visually unknown to such an early species of humanity? (I don't think
so)

At best we have a little better than 10,500 years BC that'll contribute
as to our global environment having shared a moon as depicted within
such ancient petroglyphics/pictographics. Otherwise, as of anything
previously recorded or otherwise recorded seems w/o moon, whereas the
likes of pre 12,000 BC Earth seems as though entirely without offering
any appreciation of that nearby and otherwise of what should have been
an extremely extra earthshine illuminated moon, whereas most certainly
not all of mother Earth had been frozen solid. At least +/- 20 degrees
(Tropic of Cancer/Capricorn) near the equator remained as extensively
ice free, although winter snow coverage may have reached a bit further,
therefore the albedo of mother Earth had to have been 0.75 if not
greater, and that's a simply a substantial amount of moon illuminating
earthshine.

Via the Dropas/Dzopas and of those nifty CD like stone disks of their
micro inscribed format of recorded history, and of the graphics upon
their 10,000 BC cave habitats which do establish the moon as being a
part of Earth's thawing environment, which thus far according to modern
science wasn't at the time transpiring all that much differently than
the many ice age cycles before. Although there's a few thousand years
worth of somewhat unual thermal hovering rather than merely peaking
within the latest period of thaw, which clearly remains as an ongoing
and fairly rapid overshoot, which leaves us with a great deal to learn
of what actually transpired, as of those first indications of having
Earth's new and improved environment obtaining a working moon as of
roughly 10,500 BC.

http://www.burlingtonnews.net/dropas.html
"In the years since the discovery of the first disc, archeologists and
anthropologists had learned more about the isolated Bayan-Kara-Ula area.
And much of the information seemed to corroborate the bizarre story
recorded on the discs."

"Legend still preserved in the area spoke of small, gaunt, yellow faced
men who 'came from the clouds, long, long ago'. The men had huge,
bulging heads and puny bodies and were so ugly and repellent that they
were hounded down by local tribesmen on horseback. Strangely, the
description of the 'invaders' tallied with the skeletons orginally
discovered in the caves by Professor Chi Pu Tei. On the walls of the
caves themselves archeologists had uncovered crude pictures of the
rising Sun, the Moon, unidentifiable stars and the Earth... all joined
together by lines of pea-sized dots. Along with the discs, the cave
drawings had been dated around 12,000 years old."

So, what's there to behold that's established as of prior to 10,500 BC,
as having depicted our environment along with such an impressive looking
moon?

Lascaux cave paintings / 15,000 BC w/o moon
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lascaux
http://www.culture.gouv.fr/culture/arcnat/lascaux/en/
These and of so many other similar and quite possibly of older drawings
around the globe simply fail to depict nor otherwise having suggested
anything as to any such extremely nearby moon. I wonder why that is?

Was our moon so gosh darn nearby and perhaps so much more so reflective,
in that they'd considered it our second sun, or was it merely invisible?

For it's apparent size and especially of having been closer in, plus
receiving an extra special amount of earthshine, and especially if that
moon had been still hosting a surface layer of it's orginal salty ice,
as such it would have been appearing as though looking nearly as bright
as the sun.

If these 15,000+BC folks of Lascaux were so good as they were at
artistically depicting such 3D depth and of proper physiological
dimentions of terrain, plants and animals, then why are there other
depictions around the globe as having offered so many images of
extremely weird looking humans, as though looking so ET and/or of
somewhat as though 50/50 human+animal ET looking?

And, why not of similar detailed images or other depictions of
themselves, or were they all Muslim?

Other much older graphics are equally without moon.
http://www.jqjacobs.net/rock_art/dawn.html
"Australian rock art may be as old as human occupation of that
continent, up to 60,000 years old and perhaps far older. Hundreds of
Australian sites may predate the cave art of Europe (Bednarik). In
Tanzania rock art sites date back about 50,000 years (Karoma). Painted
and engraved images of animals on stone slabs have been excavated and
dated to 28,000 years ago in Namibia (Feder and Park). The oldest known
example of rock art in Europe is an arrangement of eighteen cup marks on
a rock slab over a child's burial in a French cave. Radiocarbon dates
for European paintings range back to more than 32,000 years (Gould). By
this time art traditions are known to have existed in southern Africa,
the Levant, eastern Europe, India and Australia (Bednarik). A California
rock art site has been dated to about 20,000 years ago, based on
analysis of mineral varnish covering a pictograph (Bower 96a)."

"The most sophisticated techniques, shading, outlining and
representation of movement, are now known to have existed in the
earliest Paleolithic art in Europe, more than 30,000 years ago."

Now I'm further wondering as to when exacly did such rock nifty art or
other formats of petroglyphics/pictographics start to include our moon,
that you'd have to think was rather unavoidably impressive?

Of fairly modern depictions on behalf of Earth having two suns, or
perhaps most likely intended to represent that of the sun and of our
extremely nearby icy moon are those depictions as having been
contributed since the end of the last ice age era (8000~10500 BC), and
thus representing a somewhat recent planetology w/moon timeline of a
fairly modern day version of our evolutionary history.
http://www.jqjacobs.net/rock_art/chelly.html
http://www.jqjacobs.net/rock_art/images/narbonae.jpg
This seems to suggest that earlier humans were either quite terribly
dumb and dumber heathens that were afraid of their own shadows, or that
perhaps they were a species of physiologically impaired sight or perhaps
that of actually being blind. Either that or perhaps they never once
stuck their proto-human heads outside of their caves for an honest
look-see at whatever had to have been rather nicely illuminating their
snowy cold and clear nighttime.

I believe this item offers a rather unusually large depiction of our
early moon:
Sedona Back Country - Sun or Moon Pictograph
http://gosw.about.com/od/bestdaytrip...onahike_10.htm
http://z.about.com/d/gosw/1/5/v/Pictograph1.jpg

I interpret this next one is just that of our moon and sun (unless that
second sun is that representing Sirius), thereby proving that as of
somewhat recent though of primitive humans could in fact draw a good
number of such items, including the capability of their having no
apparent problems with having depicted our extremely nearby moon within
somewhat proper proportion to that of our sun.
http://www.hao.ucar.edu/Public/image...es/slide20.png

Unfortunately, I'm obviously not nearly smart enough because, I'm still
looking for those of ice age and/or of whatever's pre ice age or at
least as to appreciating whatever's the earliest versions of these
depictions that'll so happen to include our moon. Thus far we're not
seeing all that much, are we, or am I the only fool on Earth that's
thinking outside the mainstream status quo box.

Here's what's depicted as seeming very ET and otherwise depicting as a
rather unusually large moon in relationship to our human stature and
that of our sun, and otherwise of Earth as clearly having two suns.
There's also a few interesting looking aircraft/spacecraft items, and
all of this again transpiring from a time well after the peak of the
last ice age cycle, such as when Earth was nearly 50% frozen solid
and/or covered in those much longer lasting winter seasons of thick
snow...
http://www.crystalinks.com/ancientastronauts.html
So, once again man's artistic realm should have had no intellectual nor
apparent physiological problems in having depicted that moon of ours,
yet as of much earlier depictions of having demonstrated much greater
artistic expertise than necessary (including a good deal of 3D depth of
perspective view) failed to share or otherwise having included any such
highly illuminated moon.

This by rights interprets as though all available terrestrial evidence
by way of our own kind has more than depicted our early planetary
history as having been without moon, thereby indicating that our moon is
actually that of a fairly recent arrival, and perhaps that same analogy
might as well go for the planet Venus that should otherwise have been
unavoidably and thus easily included within such early (peak ice age or
pre ice age) notations.

Perhaps this next item is within the timeline of the arrival of our
moon, or possibly it's merely that of our having received a rather
significant multi-teratonne worth of a moon iceberg, such as having
created the arctic ocean basin as of roughly 10500~11000 BC.
http://mirrorh.com/timeline1.html (11,000 B.C. - 9,000 B.C.)
"The northern regions of Alaska and Siberia appear to have been the
worst hit by the murderous upheavals between 13,000 and 11,000 years
ago. In a great swathe of death around the edge of the Artic Circle the
remains of uncountable numbers of large animals have been found -
including many carcases with the flesh still intact, and astonishing
quantities of perfectly preserved mammoth tusks. Indeed, in both
regions, mammoth carcases have been thawed to feed to sled dogs and
mammoth steaks have featured on restaurant menus in Fairbanks. One
authority has commented, 'Hundreds of thousands of individuals must have
been frozen immediately after death and remained frozen, otherwise the
meat and the ivory would have spoiled ... Some powerful general force
was certainly at work to bring the catastrophe about.' " [Graham
Hancock, Fingerprints Of The Gods, p. 212-213]

Somewhere around the timeline of 10,500 ~ 11,000 BC, Earth received
quite a substantial booty of advanced tools and intellectual expertise,
as though it all just fell out of the sky. Seemingly there were also a
variety of new species introduced, as though having somewhat God like or
via intelligent design having arrived and/or materialized out of
nowhere. Older than 10,500 BC depictions of our moon seem to be as
stealth as any Iraqi WMD, although, of other and much older artistic
expertise seems as though quite good enough and even somewhat impressive
looking, except oddly w/o moon.

Everything which includes our moon or Venus seems to have been depicted
as though having transpirored since our last thaw (10000~11000 BC),
meaning that only as of our most recent ice age has there been
depitstion of such, and there's lots other as having been telling us
this very same story over and over.
http://home.earthlink.net/~pcstef/venus_stone_age.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_character
Even China that had been perhaps the most intellectually,
technologically and artistically advance species, whereas even their
pictophonetics is coming up a little short of having included a moon
symbol at merely 6500 BC, whereas those little Dropas/Dzopas of China
having previously arrived along with their having engraved those CD like
stone disks seem to offer the most advanced skills as of their 10,000 BC
arrival are still of what's essentially sequestered as much as possible,
perhaps because of whom they were and of where they may have come from.
The only folks not telling us this honest story are the NASA/Apollo
rusemasters and of their loyal borg like collective of apparently incest
cloned Third Reich collaborating minions, that have essentially
everything you can imagine to lose if they so much as give an inch.

Unfortunate for the truth, as well as humanity and that of our failing
environment, it seems those following in the pagan faith-based footsteps
of our NASA are every bit as much at fault as are the originators of
this ongoung fiasco. So, we're talking tens of thousands of fools upon
fools and with more on the way that'll need to accept responsibility and
the consequences of their actions.

Obviously others and I could be wrong (certainly wouldn't be the first
time), in which case you folks that insist our moon is nearly as old,
essentially made of Earth and typically a passive orb that's safe to
walk upon, can easily point out all of those pre ice age pictographics
of what had to have been our extremely nearby and extra reflective moon,
that which should have been downright if not extremely impressive,
especially at colder times when considering the mostly snow and ice
covered Earth that included our icy and snowy environment as far south
as Cuba as having contributed to a nearly 75% albedo worth of
earthshine, which should have been unavoidably illuminating upon that
rather nearby and thus rather enormous looking pre-ice-age moon of ours,
that is if in fact such ever existed.

With Henry Kroll's and those of my ongoing research and of our
subsequent thoughts or best swag of the day, of our world previously not
having such nifty worth of tidal energy for physically causing such
horrific amounts of inside and out friction, or that of having been
contributing an extra share of secondary IR energy, and of thereby
having extensively kept our geothermal and solar influx of our
terrestrial thermal energy better distributed, chances are that the
previous ice ages w/o moon would have been much worse off (which I do
believe science has since proven they were), with only the latest thaw
as having been contributed and therefore affected by way of having those
lunar tidal forces and extra IR energy influx at play, is most likely
why we'll never see another deep ice age or even a mini-freeze,
especially since having contributed so much of our biological and
industrial byproducts and waste, along with our unmitigated arrogance is
what's going to continually see to the elimination of any significant
snowball's chance in hell, of our ever obtaining greater snow coverage
along with glacial and/or sea-ice improvements.

As a direct result of modern humanity's total indifference and via a
little secondary factor of whatever our moon contributes, snow and ice
are gradually becoming yet another thing of the past, which isn't
entirely a bad thing if you can afford the necessary time and resources
in order to deal with such changes. Of course, the poor and those
indifferent the truth may literally have to appreciate the task of
outrunning vast storms, swimming for their lives and otherwise of how to
go jellyfish (meaning ocean dead zones of mostly jellyfish will have to
become their new and improved resource of seafood).
-
Brad Guth


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG