Raving wrote:
wrote:
It is also interesting to see that Raving
fabricates the stupid comment:
"Bellyaching about being unfairly "set upon" seems to be more
satisfying
to you."

I assert that Raving is a bare faced liar,
and challenge him to reference anywhere I have stated this.
Yawn. ... Not explicitly stated. Merely, tacitly assumed ...

In http://tinyurl.com/j5gmd Potter wrote ... [Quoting]

" Raving makes a good point when he points out that when anyone makes a
post critical of Jews or Israel, that they have to be prepared to be
"Mel Gibsoned", and have to respond to numerous posts.

As can be seen from my web sites, and my posts to sci.physics, when I
am not responding to the low class, personal attacks by Jews, I make a
lot of creative, interesting post about physics.

One would think that if Jews were as smart and moral as they pretend to
be, that they would address messages in a rational, intelligent. MORAL
way, and not "Mel Gibson' the messengers. "

"It is revealing to see Double-A post:
"I no longer nominate people for such awards.."

Of course, Double-A doesn't tell you that the reason he doesn't is that
has nominated me for such awards, and aggressively spammed the net
trying to round up the five or ten votes it takes to get me elected,
and was laughed and insulted out of the groups he was spamming with his
neurotic hate.

He tucked his tail between his legs, went away, licked his wounds, and
built up the courage (Insanity) to try again.

I was pleased to see Double-A urge folks to visit my sites, (Even
though he thinks that the implication is a damnation of my sites.) ...
[End Quote]


When set out to make an example of some maladjusted nut case,
I fully expect to be personally attacked by the nut case.
Yawn. ... Not explicitly stated. Merely, tacitly assumed ...
Yawn. ... Not explicitly stated. Merely, tacitly assumed ...
Yawn. ... Not explicitly stated. Merely, tacitly assumed ...
Yawn. ... Not explicitly stated. Merely, tacitly assumed ...
Yawn. ... Not explicitly stated. Merely, tacitly assumed ...
...

======================================

A person who chooses to play, fast and loose with the distinction
between ...

* Explicitly stated
* Tacitly assumed

... is behaving like an idiot;
... or is a 'bare faced liar';

As an idiot wouldn't recognize that he/she was lying; it takes
precedence and is inclusive.

IMO, Potter is an idiot.

Cordially,

Raving

Wow, classic conditioned response there. Exactly what we expected you
to write.

-- Nth Complexity --
-- Have A Nice Day! --
"However, these criteria, admirable as they are, are insufficient
for a *liberatory* postmodern science: they liberate human beings
from the tyranny of 'absolute truth' and 'objective reality', but
not necessarily from the tyranny of other human beings. In Andrew
Ross' words, we need a science 'that will be publicly answerable
and of some service to progressive interests.'" -- A.D.S.





--
Sent by 2 from yahoo within area com
This is a spam protected message. Please answer with reference header.
Posted via http://www.usenet-replayer.com