Thread: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification
View Single Post
  #2  
Old July 8th 06, 09:40 PM posted to alt.astronomy,alt.usenet.kooks
Phineas T Puddleduck[_1_]
external usenet poster
  
Posts: 310
Default A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on themoon - photogrammetric rectification



On 8/7/06 21:39, in article
, "Warhol"
wrote:


Also, have you ever compared the "moon" videos space combinations to
those that are used actually and then in lower orbit?

With the solar eruptions that occured during that first "moon mission"
the astronauts would had their DNA fried...

When you get your science from Brad "kooky" Guth, I'm not surprised you come
up with such ill educated bull****.

--

Relf's Law? -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
"Bull**** repeated to the limit of infinity asymptotically approaches
the odour of roses."
Corollary -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
³It approaches the asymptote faster, the more Œpseduos¹ you throw in your
formulas.²
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Jaffa cakes. Sweet delicious orange jaffa goodness, and an abject lesson
Why parroting information from the web will not teach you cosmology.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Official emperor of sci.physics, head mumbler of the "Cult of INSANE
SCIENCE". Pay no attention to my butt poking forward, it is expanding.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+