View Single Post
  #4  
Old July 8th 06, 08:14 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Warhol[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,588
Default A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification


Phineas T Puddleduck schreef:

On 8/7/06 16:15, in article
, "Warhol"
wrote:

Aldrin was asked to swear on the bible that he went to the moon... and
surprisse surprisse .. He REFUSED to answer the question, if they realy
went up there... the only place where they have been is the dessert of
neveda... POINT for the Moon File... Let them now proof to me that
right now the Astronuts are in the international space station ISS...
even that they cant proof... ALL SPACE PROGRAMS are FAKE...

and let them also proof that they sent Robots to Mars... Ha Ha Ha all
fake illusion for god believers eyes... what you see is not always the
truth ... try to remember that.

The Ancient of time called this Magic... and I call it fake Religion.


You're such a useless ****wit its unbelievable.

--


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cost of the Lies and the Price of Truth

http://warfolly.vzz.net/costoflies.html

Most people can't figure out
that what other people say
all depends on who they work for
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

In summary....

For lies - you would be 'handsomely rewarded' by the ZOG in Washington.

For truth - you would be put in jail (unless you're a Jew) and the key
thrown away by the ZOG in Washington.