wrote:
I've been watching the Shuttle (STS-121) in orbit and docked with the
ISS.
The astronauts have begun their space walk and I've noticed that in all

the video and still shots they are showing, there are no stars in the
background.

Why do you suppose that is ??

Simple; would you folks like some internet posted examples, of film
and/or of CCD obtained images that unavoidably included our physically
dark moon along with a few other pesky items, such as Mars, Jupiter,
Venus and Mercury, plus even a few of those having included the
brighter of available stars?

Actually from the vantage of photographing from the actual lunar
surface it would have been impossible not to have included a few other
items, of at least one or two extras at a time none the less. Too bad
we can't get a terrestrial look-see at Sirius within frame as parked
next to the physically dark terrain of our gamma and hard-X-ray nasty
moon that's still a rather salty moon none the less.

That's rather odd, since the relatively **** poor DR of unfiltered
Kodak film has absolutely no problems in recording better than a dozen
other items (obviously not all at the same time) in addition to the
physically dark moon of 0.07 albedo, as being unavoidably within the
same frame. Of course, the MESSENGER mission further proves that you
can intentionally select the lower portion of any given CCD DR and/or
spectrum band-pass and thus easily filter out in order to suit whatever
you'd like to have depicted (a three year old kid should know how to
accomplish that much). The MESSENGER dynamic range was intentionally
set so freaking low that even the 0.07 albedo moon didn't record, thus
only of whatever was of 0.1 albedo or brighter could be recorded,
although extra special efforts were also made in order to avoid
including the likes of any other illuminated planets that would
otherwise have been recorded, especially including Venus as being out
of sight and thus out of mind.

Why are only Jewish Republicans as incest dumb and dumber perverts like
yourself?

What other part(s) of your mostly Jewish and thereby Republican incest
infomercial-science, that which simply can not be replicated unless
you're God or a member in good standing with your Third Reich, should
we believe in?

Please be absolutely specific, and I shall specifically reply as to
exactly whatever it is that you've got to offer.

Would you folks like another list of primary or of worthy sub-topics to
select from?
-

"If you're not looking for the truth, you will not find it."
-Brad Guth

"To believe with certainty we must begin with doubting."
-Stanislaus I

"The real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes,
but having new eyes."
-Marcel Proust

"Truth is given, not to be contemplated, but to be done. Life is an
action, not a thought."
-F.W. Robertson
~
Even Kurt Vonnegut would have to agree that; WAR is WAR, thus "in war
there are no rules" - In fact, war has been the very reason why honest
folks are having to deal with the likes of others that haven't been
playing by whatever the supposed rules, such as our resident LLPOF
warlord(GW Bush) having invented WMD seems to come to mind.

Life upon Venus, a township w/Bridge & ET/UFO Park-n-Ride Tarmac:
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
The Russian/China LSE-CM/ISS (Lunar Space Elevator)
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm
Venus ETs, plus the updated sub-topics; Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm