View Single Post
  #3  
Old July 4th 06, 02:22 AM posted to alt.usenet.kooks,sci.physics,sci.astro
Art Deco[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,280
Default Which is better to write: O or Omega_Total ?

T Wake wrote:

"Jeff.Relf" wrote in message
...
Hi Art_Deco ( a.k.a. Duckie ), www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/W.PNG
You told me: You're a kook, an underscore abuser.


Learn to read, post, and quote, maroon.

Following the Modula-2/C++ tradition that I was raised on
( Modula-2 since the start of 1982, on the Lilith computer ),


Welcome to 2006 you retard.


Was underscoreboi attempting to claim he used C++ in 1982?

Which is better to write: ? or Omega_Total ?


?

Which is more editable ? searchable ? readable ? assiduous ? you tell me.


? is better on all counts. If some one is searching for ? why should they
search for a word _you_ choose?

Its all irrelevant as you only act "different" to stand out and reclaim some
of your lost ego after your life collapsed around your ears.


I don't think he will realize it when it happens.

--
COOSN-266-06-39716
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy
Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005
Official "Usenet psychopath and born-again LLPOF minion",
as designated by Brad Guth

"And without accurate measuring techniques, how can they even
*call* quantum theory a "scientific" one? How can it possibly
be referred to as a "fundamental branch of physics"?"
-- Painsnuh the Lamer

"Well, orientals moved to the U.S. and did amazingly well on
their own, and the races are related (brown)."
-- "Honest" John pontificates on racial purity

"Significant new ideas have rarely come from the ranks of
the establishment."
-- Double-A on technology development