How about the proof-positive of Kodak physics and of the replicated
hard-science as to the visible spectrum, including the extra dosage of
near-UV and of UV-a photons which the human eye doesn't respond to, but
Kodak film does, and of how such photons tend to react and manage to
get recorded upon their Kodak film?
How about the regular laws of physics that simply do not add up to what
our NASA/Apollo wizards have been telling us?
How about NASA's very own gamma and hard-X-ray images of our moon?
Why is it that you're supposedly so smart but somehow unable to utilize
a GOOGLE or similar search engine?
BTW: those 85% reflective moonsuits and of the 80% reflective white of
our flags that blew in all of that wind are more than sufficient for
establishing the moonscape as being of 55+% reflective, plus having
multiple other artificial items of known albedo to work with seem fair.
What's a micron of dust per year worth afer a few million years? or
isn't our salty moon very old?
Dozens of other factors (including factors of radiation) have been
covered upon dozens of times, of which you're obviously too stupid
and/or dumbfounded as to locate for yourself. Why is that?
Now it seems that your own kind are telling you puck off. Why is that?
Why do you folks keep feeling the need as to put words in my mouth?
As per usual, this Usenet of e-spooks have been sharing as much
malware/****ware into my PC as their GOOGLE/Usenet can possibly
transfer without terminating itself.
-
Brad Guth
wrote:
Brad Guth wrote:
I'll try this one again.
Try it as many times as you like. Apparently you have more time at the
keyboard than you do actually providing documentation for your claims.
Your post pretty much says; "I have the proof." Do you provide a link?
No.
So I ask again.
Where do you get your numbers on the light reflecting capabilities of
the moon?
(And why would these numbers, presumbably generated from Earth, have
any bearing on someone actually standing on the surface of the moon?)
Where do you get your numbers on the moon giving off radiation?
Where do you get your number on the depth of the dust on the lunar
surface?
And finally, what makes you think the depth of the dust on the lunar
surface is even across the face of the moon?