View Single Post
  #4  
Old June 11th 06, 02:05 AM posted to sci.space.policy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default NASA cancels soil moisture satellite

On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 20:39:03 -0400, in a place far, far away,
"jonathan" made the phosphor on my monitor glow in
such a way as to indicate that:

At least Nasa has the priorities right. Putting four people on
the Moon to do....ah...well...to build...something important for
....oh...I think...something else, or somewhere else... sometime..
But it must be important, that reason for going to the Moon, or else
they wouldn't go and spend eleventy billion dollars of their money
and decades of their time doing it.


Where in NASA's charter does it state that it's responsible
for...doing something else?

I mean I've gotten used to hurricanes, and everyone else can
get used to an occasional flood or pesky drought. Besides
everyone knows if we just forget about it for awhile the whole
thing will go away. The global warming thing that is.

It's better not to know anyways, why scare people when we can
just sweep it under the rug and let them lives their lives
without worry.

I mean I certaintly don't care about the future, and I'm
sure most people if you ask them will agree, that they
couldn't care less what kind of world their children
live in. That's their problem.


By what broken thought process have you come to believe that people
who don't agree with you or Algore don't care about the future?