"jacob navia" wrote in message
...
a écrit :
http://tinyurl.com/res5k
I remember that there was a big public relations problem with
environmental scientists at NASA.
The problem with scientists is that they could tell the facts, so the
best solution is to cancel all their stuff so that we have no
data to worry about.
This continues the environmental policy of the U.S. government
to its logical consequences.
At least Nasa has the priorities right. Putting four people on
the Moon to do....ah...well...to build...something important for
.....oh...I think...something else, or somewhere else... sometime..
But it must be important, that reason for going to the Moon, or else
they wouldn't go and spend eleventy billion dollars of their money
and decades of their time doing it.
I mean I've gotten used to hurricanes, and everyone else can
get used to an occasional flood or pesky drought. Besides
everyone knows if we just forget about it for awhile the whole
thing will go away. The global warming thing that is.
It's better not to know anyways, why scare people when we can
just sweep it under the rug and let them lives their lives
without worry.
I mean I certaintly don't care about the future, and I'm
sure most people if you ask them will agree, that they
couldn't care less what kind of world their children
live in. That's their problem.
What's important is that all of us understands who owns Nasa.
The huge margin of victory by Bush gives him a mandate
to do whatever he damn well pleases. It's his decision, and
his alone, and we should understand that anyone
that doesn't play ball has to be emasculated so that
no one else dare to criticize his vision for our future.
Chaos would follow if they allowed any dissent at all.
Anyways we serve at his pleasure, he's the boss and
it's his way or the highway. That's just the way God
wants it.
Our leader has a dream, it's his dream, and it must be good.
Who are we to challange the scientific and philosophical
wisdom, the technical expertise and judgement, of our
President?
s