Dogon_Tribe_from_Sirius_B ) wrote:
: Eric Chomko wrote:
: Dogon_Tribe_from_Sirius_B ) wrote:
: : The faithful witness to truth is likened unto a well in which
: : hope springs eternal - positive law coincides with justification
: : by faith, and not simply by additional work forced on the
: : believer! Yet one would believe that Mr. brian_a_m_stuckless
: : has found a niche for expounding what he believes (in his artful
: : conception) the rules of behavior governing particles and waves,
: : their interactions, symmetry, and of course, equations. So why
: : is it, that mankind is unable to tap the vast resources of this
: : intellectual capital? This idea warrants further investigation.
:
: It is the difference between an arhictect and someone that actually builds
: the buildings.

: That's your interpretation. It is, uh, what is "it"? A tool? And the
: word
: "actually" is what - in the motion of objective experience? We're
: talking about the "interrelationship" or "coexistence" of
: subject/object,
: not the ideologues of each.

Of course it's my interpretation. Are you going to say it's 'wrong' now?

:
: : Those who are practiced in the art of positive law are able to
: : achieve widespread communication of their plans and intentions.
: : The only thing preventing a believer from attaining his highest
: : achievement are the "chains" which bind the intellectual prowess
: : from being exercised at the right time and place. The "chains"
: : are the cunning of the weak and tame minds, which have the
: : power to resist the energy of the strong. They are imprisonments
: : of the creative imagination with fable or fiction, unable to
: : matriculate to the higher ground of application, unless some
: : important aspiration can be learned amidst the "youthful vigor",
: : in the attempt at orchestrating a one-person show, which must
: : face the lyrics of cross-correlated technological serpentry,
: : without impughning the free will of the participant or observer.
:
: All that said, this lacks in the area of being pragmatic. Einstein's work
: was able to be proven and used (beinging to) in a pragmatic sense.

: This is a political forum, not a pragmatic one, unless your talking
: funding. You are hanging a sign on the poster's posts as having
: "relativist" value, when, in fact, positive law has nothing to do
: with the "situational ethics" of a political forum.

I'm in sci.space.policy. Political to a degree and certainly we go OT a
lot, but confusing ethics (a branch of philosophy) with politics appears
to be what you're doing.

:
: : Government has been infected with the delusion of "what is
: : freedom" when the freedom itself has become liberalism. This
: : infection has spread to the moderates, who, acting in accordance
: : with the wishes of the "mob" of masses by widening the gulf between
: : its liberal and conservative constituents, by virtue of its
: : non-manipulation of the influx of illegal aliens, while at the
: : same time never being able to set a course for marginalizing the
: : huge monopolization that the energy industries have, as well as
: : the Federal Reserve, who have never once even attempted to back
: : the dollar with the gold standard. They all are as stuffed sentries
: : with no authority whatsoever, and they are rejected as lame
: : messengers of the promise!
:
: Try to stop paying your taxes and see what happens.

: The *laws* in this nation today are mostly for those who are
: practiced in the art of *sin*. Alert the nation to a new
: Constitutional Convention, and just see how many soldiers
: will join.

I doubt very many. Technically, Congress is what you're defining and the
last time I looked few soldiers were present except when the president
gives his SOU address.

:
: : Thus the loosened grip of government is immediately, by positive
: : law, caught up and empowered through new constitutional convention,
: : because the bureaucrats who stood idly by cannot for one single day
: : exist without mentorship, and the new authority abolishes the old
: : already malframed and diluted by moderates and liberalism.
:
: So more conservatism is the answer? No balance, just more power on the
: right? If you actually believe that, then you're a dupe.

: Since the power to tax is the power to destroy,

Also the power to build. Being wary of government, especially when it
comes to our money, is a wise thing to do; based upon too much government
corruption over the history of man. But, when a government of the people
by the people and for the people IS working correctly, then taxes are
well spent.

: no taxing authority
: could ever represent "intellectual capital" when the free will of
: private interests are at stake. A "luke warm" middle means
: "defining capitalism down" for conservatives, who then become
: betrayed by the "no conscience" of liberalism. Ergo, moral
: relativism for the masses - leading to mob rule, led by the
: media elite. No thanks, I'm a Constitutionalist.

Which appears to be a conclusion drawn from a series of premises which
don't seem to proceed. Don't call you a "commie". I GET that part!

:
: : Manipulation of the masses is for sociopaths. brian_am_stuckless
: : is not a manipulator of anyone. His dialecticisms are framed in
: : the highest artform available to engineers - mathematics. One
: : would tend to believe that there is a message behind using the
: : dollar signs at the borders of his reports - I can see that today
: : there is a tremendous ruse being played on the American people -
: : liberalism and dialectical moderation to the extreme. Yet the
: : ruses of the blind can in no way dilute the potency of the wise.
:
: If you think that the Power Elite is a bunch of liberals, then you are
: mistaken. "None Dare Call It Conspiracy", by Gary Allen for all it was
: worth made the exact same mistake. You cannot have a Power Elite exist
: within the context of them being all liberal or all conservative, as they
: certainly occupy all parts of the political spectrum. Currently, I
: believe that the majority of the Power Elite are mostly conservative,
: virtually opposite of what you are stating. The fact that write off
: moderates with liberals means you have an agenda. Period!

: I never said who I thought the "Power Elite" were. But I can show you
: all of the symptoms in a society gone awry when populism rules the
: roost - liberalism and dialectical moderation being dictated to the
: masses day in and day out in the spirit of the media gods, and not
: the truthful science faction that we'd all like to be a part of, in the
: noble attempts to dominionize and populate the heavens with our
: species; as grains of sand in the universe!

Pure capitalism won't give you the utopia you cite above. It almost sounds
like you're a closet socialist, but I digress...

: Is this who you are
: saying that the Power Elite represent? It isn't George Bush, or
: anyone in government that I can think of, by virtue of the fact that
: I can see subtle, competing interests at stake with 9-11, with Bush
: and big oil seemingly playing both sides of the 9-11 political
: spectrum,

Perhaps not IN the government but peripherally involved. Look up 'PNAC' on
wiki for a list of names.

: being "pulled by strings" of an even greater authority,
: internationalism.
: Now 9-11 is now a worn-out excuse for rising gas prices and
: inflation, all caused by the greed and conspiracy of gas hog
: manufacturers, environmentalists, taxing authorities, ethically
: blind purchasers of same, tiptoeing plutocrats, and their ongoing
: campaign of raising their armies of prosecuting attorneys and
: feel-good politicians in order to invalidate the real truth of needing
: more advanced R&D, and less judicial activism in order to ac-
: complish the same. I'm a constitutionalist, plain and simple.
: Count me out of your fiasco of the populist movement!

How is a constitutionalist going to get more R&D funding? I'm a flipping
techno-scientist and tell you to shove your political stance in favor of
technology and the furtherment of mankind. You speak the same ends, curse
the same demon yet embrace a vehicle that is DOA.

:
: : Political shadiness are for those who can't withstand the light
: : of truth. Only the knowingly-ignorant will perish of their own
: : accord. The free will of the force of faithful intuition can never
: : be resisted. Mr. brian_a_m_stuckless is a simple example of the
: : force of faithful intuition. How much he is right, I am not sure.
: : But I can say one thing: the "proud" will succumb to the applica-
: : tions of the wise, and will be banished from advancing the
: : applications and benefits of harmonious science!
:
: I'v read his posts and never concluded anything political from them. Now
: you come along and throw a politcal bent on them. Exactly what IS your
: agenda? Care to share?

: You've never concluded anything? Then only YOU can be right in NOT
: concluding anything. If you have no message in this usenet, what good
: is it to post anything?

You tell me why you're here and we'll take it from there. I like the part
about R&D funding but that isn't in the Constitution you seem to be
wrapped up in. Perhaps it is me that is confused but you don't make
clarity a top priority.

Eric

:
: Eric
:
: : "brian a m stuckless" wrote in message
: : ...
: : $$ TRUE physical
: :
: :
: :
: :
: : What would be your reaction to finding those that still believe
: : the earth is flat?
: :
: : The either/or certainty of science and religion in truth define
: : equal and opposite extremes of ignorance concerning
: : the true nature of our reality.
: :
: : Reality is defined by neither/both uncertainty such as that found
: : in the dual nature of light, or in a cloud. Where opposite extremes
: : are entractably entangled and cannot be mapped.
: : Where things tremble. That is unless the whole is destroyed
: : into one or the other. Into the simple components of reality.
: :
: : But the big joke on 'modern' science is that reality is not
: : defined by its components, or the simplest the universe
: : has to offer. The true nature of reality is displayed best
: : by the highest level of complexity.
: :
: : Which is where the opposite extremes exist at a persistent
: : phase transition ....between...each other. Where you can't tell
: : if it's a particle or wave, water or air, instinct or intelligence.
: : Science or religion.
: :
: : Whether in light, a cloud or an emotion, this neither/both
: : uncertainty is the source of all order in the universe.
: :
: : Is life defined by genetics or mutation? Or is it natural selection
: : where both/neither dominate, but combine to produce
: : self organizing order? This emergent order is a result of
: : the total weight of a nearly infinite sequence of random
: : unknowable events.
: :
: : Yet you seem to think that an idea can be understood
: : by a detailed look at each and every neuron ever
: : fired in our minds. Just as you think reality can
: : be understood by looking at what things do in
: : ever greater detail.
: :
: : Emergent order such as light, an emotion or a galaxy
: : are born from this systemic uncertainty. The one place
: : your equations or religions cannot see through is
: : the source of all order in the universe and our
: : reality.
: :
: : And the more refined, detailed or specialized your
: : component either/or...good/evil methods become, the
: : more complete is your inability to find the simplicity
: : of our existence. The greater is your ignorance of
: : reality.
: :
: : Increasing order, creation and life emerge where the
: : opposite extremes are united.
: :
: : Destruction and ignorance emerge when the opposite
: : extremes are kept apart.
: :
: : Your certain sciences and religions define only death.
: : Life and reality are defined at the edge, where
: : opposites meet and tremble unknowably.
: : As lovers do.
: :
: :
: :
: : Jonathan
: :
: : s
: :
: :
: :
: :
: :
: :
: :
: :
: :
: :
: :
: : $$
: : $$ GUESS iSS General UNiVERSAL EQUATiON of STATE SYSTEM, enthalpy:
: : $$
: : $$ |(m1*v1)^2 G*M1*m1 m1*v1^2|
: : $$ Hamiltonian ENTHALPY E = |--------- + ---------- + -------|
: : $$ | 2*M1 (n - 1)*rA 2 |
: : $$
: : $$ " " " = | eK + eG - eV |
: : $$
: : $$ " " " (Einstein) = | eK + REST energy eM |
: : $$
: : $$ " " " (Einstein) = | eK + m*c^2 |
: : $$
: : $$ | a b |
: : $$ """ (Van der Waals) = |P*(Vol - b) + {(---)*(1 - ---)} |
: : $$ | Vol Vol |
: : $$
: : $$ | a b |
: : $$ """ (Dieterici) = |x*Pc*(z*Vc - b) + {(----)*(1 - ----)}|
: : $$ | y*Vc y*Vc |
: : $$
: : $$ | a a*b |
: : $$ " " " Dieterici's.. = |x*Pc*(z*Vc - b) + ---- - --------|
: : $$ | y*Vc (y*Vc)^2|
: : $$
: : $$ | m1*v1^2|
: : $$ " " " (Bernoulli) = |P*(Vol - b) + m1*g*rA + -------|
: : $$ | 2 |
: : $$
: : $$ | m1*v1^2|
: : $$ " " " (Bernoulli) = |P*(Vol - b) + m1*v1^2 + -------|
: : $$ | 2 |.
: : $$
: : $$ GUESS iSS Volt*Amp*sec energy eV is otherwise, - (m1*v1^2 / 2).
: : $$
: : Dieterici's CRiTiCAL constants. .
: : Gibb's free energy eG.|| Pc*Vc | | Ra |
: : ANY flux formula. ||----------| = |--------| = 0.30472135.
: : Bernoulli's Law. ||("e")^2*Tc| |10*("e")|
: : TRUE physical. |Note: MOLAR CONSTANT Ra=Na*k=no*vm*k.,.
: :
: :