edrho,
Don't be "sorry", especially not to all these cloak and dagger
rusemasters.

According to our MI/NSA/CIA (aka NASA/Apollo) Usenet e-spook "Scott
Hedrick";
A *link* is not proof. A cite to an actual, existing, verifiable document
is proof. *Never* accept a website as proof of anything involving NASA;
at best, it would be a copy of an actual piece of paper, even if it were
an actual NASA website.
Scott Hedrick,
Now it seems even a fully certified link to an official NASA page is
getting their Usenet moonboot kick in the butt, especially if there's
anything the least bit skewed or potentially capable of such info
getting interpreted in any way that doesn't 100+% reinforce their
NASA/Apollo ruse/sting of the century. Imagine that, and why am I not
the least bit surprised.

I suppose next they'll have to start in with their evidence excluding
upon their very own archives of most all of those hocus-pocus
NASA/Apollo Kodak moments, especially of all those optically unfiltered
EVA obtained images and perhaps even having to include those more
interesting ones of somewhat if not entirely of what's offering us
better/believable science as having been obtained robotically from
orbit.

Our warm and fuzzy "Scott Hedrick" also had this to say as a warning or
e-threat to those taking any interest in whatever my contributions had
to offer. In other words, contribute to one of my topics and you're
worse off than dead meat, or even worse yet than if you were hiding WMD
or Usama bin Laden.
You are ending up in killfiles because we killfiled him and don't want to
read what he has to say, or what anyone says in response to him.
I do believe that's actually because I'm more often than not having
become sufficiently right about most everything I've uncovered.
Imagine that, they don't much care for sharing the truth and nothing
but the truth, or having to deal with those regular laws of physics,
much less are they being the least bit receptive to whatever
alternative evidence is being shared that doesn't have their
NASA/Apollo stamp of approval. Of course, neither did their Hitler or
GW Bush appreciate hearing the truth.

BTW; you folks don't have to always agree with me, especially if your
best available swag has anything that can be replicated as backing
whatever mindset you've got to work with.
-
Brad Guth