A *link* is not proof. A cite to an actual, existing, verifiable document is
Nproof. *Never* accept a website as proof of anything involving NASA;
at
best, it would be a copy of an actual piece of paper, even if it were an
actual NASA website.
Scott Hedrick,
Now even a fully certified link to an official NASA page is getting the
moonboot kick in the butt, especially if there's anything the least bit
skewed or potentially capable of getting interpreted that doesen't
reinforce their NASA/Apollo ruse/sting of the century. Imagine that,
and why am I not the least bit surprised.

I suppose next they'll have to start their evidence excluding upon
their very own archives of most all of those NASA/Apollo Kodak moments,
including those more interesting ones of somewhat if not entirely of
better science as having been obtained from orbit.
-
Brad Guth