View Single Post
  #9  
Old May 11th 06, 02:15 PM posted to sci.astro
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Confused about redshift and age of stars

On a sunny day (11 May 2006 02:22:39 -0700) it happened "Thomas Smid"
wrote in
.com:


With regard to the deflection, which I specifically treated on my page
http://www.plasmaphysics.org.uk/research/lensing.htm : as mentioned
there, the electric field around the sun should have a strength of
about 10^-6 V/m (due to the sun being positively charged at a potential
of about 1 kV) However, it extends over about 10^6 km , so you need
correspondingly higher field strengths for lab dimensions. If you
assume a quadratic dependence (as suggested on my webpage), then you
find that you would need lab field strengths of the order of the
inner-atomic field, which are obviously impossible to create (as it
would tear the whole lab apart at the same time) . The whole effect is
thus very much associated with astronomical distances and it is
therefore not surprising that it is unknown in classical mainstream
physics.

Thomas

OK, my apologies, I did read it again (but full day of stuff was in between),
and did see you addressed all that.
Now for the question I hope you did not already address:
You know black holes have been detected by these passing in front of 'stars' and
causing us to see the Einstein Cross.

So, if your theory is right, also black holes would beam electrons outward?