Brad Guth wrote:
Tell me how they faked that and you might have a case.
edrho,
Obviously you're so brown-nosed and otherwise incest cloned that
yourself and all of your kind know absolutely nothing about 'blue
screen' photography nor of the massive vacuum chambers constructed in
order to test/verify various system plus obviously on behalf of live
moonsuit testing.

So the flag was superimposed on the screen? Or there was a HUGE vacuum
chamber designed to look like the moon? You are a clown.

Since you're so all-knowing, perhaps you might start off by telling us
how those Kodak moments were supposedly those of our moon via actual
EVAs that had no such viable fly-by-rocket lander to start with, that
were obtained without any hint of radiation, thermal stress nor being
been the least bit color spectrum skewed, and then I'll tell you how it
was accomplished upon a mostly guano island that was dusted with a thin
composite layer of what was 55+% albedo, somewhat the likes of portland
cement and cornmeal, while having been nicely xenon lamp illuminated.

If you're talking about the actual Apollo missions, they had the LEMs.
They were clunky, but they worked. Barely as it turns out, but they
worked.

If you're talking about some other "EVA" you'll have to be a little
more clear.


BTW; Kodak's film DR was more than sufficient to have recorded other
planets besides mother Earth, and even a few of those pesky stars
(especially of the near-UV spectrum likes of the Sirius star system)
would have been impossible to have excluded.
-
Brad Guth

I'm certain the film was sensitive enough. They had the exposure
clocked down to avoid washing everything out.

I'm sorry you have trouble grasping that. OTOH, I'm sorry you bother
posting this nonsense.