edrho,
Why are you folks trying so gosh darn hard in order to prove that
you're all such an incest cloned borg collective of the Third Reich?
Are you actually that hard-line Jewish, or just pretending?

As I'd previously contributed that obviously you're all so brown-nosed
and otherwise incest cloned that yourself and all of your kind know
absolutely nothing about 'blue screen' photography nor of the massive
vacuum chambers constructed in order to test/verify various system plus
obviously on behalf of live moonsuit testing.

But since you're otherwise so gosh darn all-knowing or otherwise having
been snookered and summarily dumbfounded to boot, perhaps you might
start off by telling us village idiots how those Kodak moments were
supposedly those of our moon via actual EVAs that had no such viable
fly-by-rocket lander to start with, that were obtained without any hint
of radiation, thermal stress nor being been the least bit color
spectrum skewed, and then I'll tell you how it was accomplished upon a
mostly guano island that was dusted with a thin composite layer of what
was most often represented as the 55+% albedo, somewhat the likes of
portland cement and cornmeal, while having been nicely xenon lamp
illuminated.

BTW; Kodak's film DR was more than sufficient to have recorded other
planets besides mother Earth, and even a few of those pesky stars
(especially sensitive of easily having recorded the near-UV spectrum
likes of the Sirius star system) as such would have been impossible to
have excluded.

Since unfiltered Kodak film doesn't lie, therefore, how many lies upon
lies are you folks planning upon telling us?

There's so much that's terrestrial about those EVA Kodak moments that
it's almost too silly having to explain the obvious over and over. The
laws of Kodak's photon physics are exactly what they are, and of our
radioactive and otherwise naked, physically dark and downright nasty
plus badly reactive moon of gamma and hard-X-rays is exactly what it
is. Where's the problem?
-
Brad Guth