wrote:
Nog (aka "Only a total retard would think it was faked")
Only a Third Reich clone of a brown-nosed minion like yourself would
use infomercial-science and those NASA/Apollo conditional laws of
physics.
You do realize just how gosh darn gamma and hard-X-ray hot and DNA
nasty our moon is.
You do realize that our moon isn't covered with a thin layer of
portland cement and cornmeal.
You do realize that Kodak's photon physics proves that those EVA images

were not of our moon.
You do realize that your infomercial-science and conditional laws of
physics proves nothing.

You do realize that your type of bantering proves nothing ??

How do you know what is or is not on the Moon if we have never been
there ??

It seems to me that you are very "selective" in what you believe, not
looking for the truth at all, only looking to perpetuate your own
cause, however unrealistic it is.

I've wondered that. I asked him once where he got his numbers from and
I think his rant translated to; "This is stuff that everyone knows."
But, if you've read any number of Brad's posts, you realize that trying
to figure out what he means from what he writes is always problematic!