In article . com,
"newedana" wrote:
Chandra X-ray Observatory revealed a new generation of stars spawned by a
super-massive black hole at the center of the Milky Way galaxy. This novel
mode of star formation may solve several mysteries about these super-massive
black holes that reside at centers of nearly all galaxies released on 5 Oct
2005.
According to a new result from NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory,
released on November 2, 2005, "neutron star discovered where a black
hole was expected -- a very massive star collapsed to form a neutron
star and not a black hole as expected ."

So the upper limit for a neutron star was off, or maybe it takes time.

This one of the greatest discoveries ever made in the history of human
science

Oh total BS. Like all your posts.

proves that existing astrophysical hypotheses explaining the
mechanism of forming stars and black holes from the cosmic gas clouds
such as giant piles of hydrogen, and subsequent migration theory of
stars, are out of real science. However, these Chandra’s astronomical
results were excellently predicted just 7 years before the revelation
of the news in Dr. Yoon’s New Physics
(www.yoonsphysics.blogspot.com), published in 1999 and then 2004 in
English version, titled ‘Natural Science Founded on A New Atomic
Model’. It is as follows

More BS. Don't you ever get tired playing the fool?

The diameter of a hydrogen atom is 10^-10 meters while its proton’s
10^-15 m, so their volume ratio is 1/10^15. It signifies in turn that
99.999999....(fifteen 9s) volume percent of a hydrogen atom is vacant
space. If this vacant space is completely squeezed out from its atomic
structure, the pure mass remained would have the utmost density of
7×10^7 metric tons/cc, since the density of liquid hydrogen is
0.071g/cc. This density may be equivalent to that of imaginary
substance of singularity.
Allegedly the repulsion between two electrons is 4.17×10^42 times as
great as that of gravitation acting between them when estimated from
Newton’s and Coulomb’s laws. This enormous ratio of these two
forces suggests explicitly that moving behavior of orbital electron is
entirely governed by its electromagnetic character, and negligibly
small is its mass effect. Nevertheless, present atomic model was built
based on this mass concept of orbital electron, moving at the speed of
light around its nucleus, obeying the rule of projectile mechanics.
Thus, believed is that the orbital electron of hydrogen atom builds a
kind of micro persistent current ring, as that flowing permanently
through a closed circuit of superconductor, since the atomic space is
an ideally perfect vacuum to be a room temperature superconductor for
moving electrons. Allegedly, the persistent current is possible to flow
through a superconductor of any complexly combined pathway system if it
builds a closed circuit. However, electron taken account as a mass
particle is unable to move permanently through such a pathway system.
The superconductor turns out to float upon an external magnet because
of the Missioner’s diamagnetic effect. Likewise, the orbital electron
building a micro persistent current ring does not fall into its nucleus
but floats around the nucleus due to its nuclear magnetism. That is why
orbital electron never merges to its nucleus, and can perform orbital
motion permanently at near the speed of light around its nucleus
without any energy supply.

Two words -- quantum mechanics.

Total crap.