View Single Post
  #15  
Old April 3rd 06, 08:34 PM posted to uk.sci.astronomy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default the moons size coincidence?


"Mark McIntyre" wrote in message
...
On 3 Apr 2006 05:03:04 -0700, in uk.sci.astronomy , "Weatherlawyer"
wrote:


But anyway its not coincidence, its a local minimum in the energy
configuration of two bodies. As the Moon rotates, its rocks are
deformed by the gravity of the earth. This absorbs energy. Eventually,
the energy loss caused the rotation to slow. Once the orbital speed
and rotational speed 'matched' the rocks stopped being distorted, no
more energy was lost, and a stable state was reached.

The same is happening to the Earth by the way, and to many other moons
in the solar system.
Mark McIntyre
--


Yes.
Charon and Pluto are locked too; (no comments as to whether Pluto is a
planet please).
More to the point, ALL other known moons in the Solar System are
gravitationally locked to the parent planet, except Phoebe.
In addition:
Mercury is locked to the Sun, actually a 3:2 spin-orbit resonance which
accounts for it's large libration.
And Venus is locked to the Earth so that at closest approach it always has
the same side facing us. Not only is the orbit (year) of Venus in a 5:8
resonance with the Earth year, but its rotation (day) is in a 3:2 resonance
with the Earth year.

All this talk of coincidence and divine design is pure codswallop, taking no
account of natural mechanics. All the orbital distances and periods are
related geometrically for the same reason that a pendulum swings in simple
harmonic motion.