In article ,
Mark McIntyre wrote:

You've merely picked a bad frame of reference,

What's bad about it?

and are applying inadmissible maths to it.

What's inadmissible about it?

I've seen proofs that circles have smaller circumferences than
the inscribed square, that -1==1 and so forth, done similarly.

Yes, and I can see the mathematical errors in them. What's the
error in this case?

-- Richard