Art Deco writes:

Another cowardly sneck of the attributions,

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

oar pin.

Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still suffering from attribution problems?

Another cowardly sneck of AUK,

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

oar pin.

Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still suffering from attribution problems?

Nice post edit and sneck of the attributions,

Classic erroneous presupposition.

Classic lie.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

oar pin.

Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still suffering from attribution problems?

Classic evasion.

I'm well aware that your failure to answer my questions constitutes
evasion, Deco. No need to tell me about it.

Nice post edit and sneck of the attributions,

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Classic lie,

On your part, Deco.

Classic lie.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

oar pin.

Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still suffering from attribution problems?

Classic evasion.

I'm well aware that your failure to answer my questions constitutes
evasion, Deco. No need to tell me about it.

oar pin.

Who is "oar pin", Deco?

That would be you, Tholen.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Classic lie.

Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Still suffering from attribution problems?

Still stupid.

Is that your explanation for your ongoing attribution problem, Deco?
Very well.

Classic stupidity.

Is that your explanation for your ongoing attribution problem, Deco?
Very well.

Oh, and your lame attempt to hide from AUK,

Classic erroneous presupposition.

Classic lie,

On your part, Deco.

Classic lie.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

oar pin.

Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still stupid?

Tholen graduates to monkey-see-monkey-do lames.

I see that you didn't answer the questions, Deco. No surprise there,
really. Instead, you chose to spew yet another invective.

where you are always on-topic,

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Classic lie,

On your part, Deco.

Note: no response.

oar pin.

Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still stupid?

Classic IKYABWAI.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

is defeated.

Classic pontification.

Classic Tholenization.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Classic lie.

Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

[cowardly snecked froups restored]

Classic erroneous presupposition, but good to see you admit that
you're responsible for the addition of irrelevant newsgroups to
the distribution, Deco.

Classic lie,

On your part, Deco.

Classic lie.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

oar pin.

Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still stupid?

Classic evasion.

I'm well aware that your failure to answer my questions constitutes
evasion, Deco. No need to tell me about it.

*BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK*
*BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK*
*BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK*
*BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK*
*BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK*
*BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK*

Non sequitur, but an interesting parallel to Michael Baldwin Bruce.

Classic cowardice.

Also non sequitur, unless you're using that as an explanation for why
you're emulating Michael Baldwin Bruce.

Double-A wrote:

wrote:

Ah go easy on Tholen, John.

I didn't invite him over her to be ridiculed. Bruce has already done
enough of that.

He really is a accomplished scientist, and I respect him for that, not
just your usual Usenet blowhard, even though he is a bit eccentric
here.

He has discovered many asteroids, and even has one named after him.
More dauntingly, he discovered an asteroid that is on a track to bring
possible doom to the Earth in the 2030's. If it misses the Earth, it
is thought it will swing into an orbit that will bring it back for 2nd
and 3rd runs at it!

Dr. Tholen is also and expert on Pluto and a consultant to NASA.

He's also an award-winning ko0k:

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, and rather ironic.

Oh look, the Coward of the Month alumnus is trying to run away from his
awards again:

Referring to yourself, Deco?

Your reading comprehension problems are rife,

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, and rather ironic, coming
from someone who still hasn't gotten the attribution correct.

St. Foamy mode now, too,

Is that what you call your response style, Deco?

Classic IKYABWAI.

I see that you didn't answer the question, Deco. No surprise there, really.

along with your serial hypocrisy.

Classic erroneous presupposition.

Classic lie.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Froth on,

Classic erroneous presupposition.

Classic lie.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

oar pin.

Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still stupid?

Classic IKYABWAI.

I see that you didn't answer the question, Deco. No surprise there, really.

oar pin.

Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still suffering from attribution problems?

Note: no response.

Classic Tholobot response.

Is that how you describe your failure to respond, Deco?

After all, you are still using a fake
name, as cowards do.

Please post evidence that I've won Coward of the Month.

Non sequitur. I was talking about your fake name, Deco.

Oh it is highly seqitur,

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Classic lie.

Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

oar pin.

Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still stupid?

Classic IKYABWAI.

I see that you didn't answer the question, Deco. No surprise there, really.

You've won both Coward of the Month and Kook of the Month.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, but rather ironic, coming
from someone so cowardly that he uses a fake name, and someone who has
an affinity for kooks and their newsgroup.

Classic lie.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

But you will try to lie about this again, I predict.

What does your failed prediction have to do with colored text in
DeScribe, Deco?

Classic Tholobot response.

Is that how you describe your failure to respond, Deco?

Better yet, nominate me.

What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Deco?

Note: no response.

Classic Tholobot response.

Is that how you describe your failure to respond, Deco?

Hi, oar pin!

Non sequitur.

Another chance to run away from your awards,

Also non sequitur.

Also highly seqitur,

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Classic lie.

Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

oar pin.

Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still stupid?

Classic IKYABWAI.

Is that how you describe your failure to respond, Deco?

oar pin:

Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still suffering from attribution problems?

I see you've got the Tholobot Lamer working well again,

Classic erroneous presupposition, coupled with classic evasion.

Classic lie.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

will you be starting the Holy Digestor up also?

What does your question have to do with colored text in
DeScribe, Deco?

Classic Tholobot response.

Is that how you describe your failure to respond, Deco?

Another chance to run away from your awards,

Classic erroneous presupposition.

Classic lie.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

oar pin:

Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still stupid?

Classic IKYABWAI.

Is that how you describe your failure to respond, Deco?

*BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK*
*BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK*
*BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK*
*BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK*
*BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK*
*BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK*

Non sequitur, but an interesting parallel to Michael Baldwin Bruce.

Classic cowardice.

Also non sequitur, unless you're using that as an explanation for why
you're emulating Michael Baldwin Bruce.

[cowardly snecked froups restored]

Classic erroneous presupposition.

Classic lie, as anyone can plainly see by comparing the newsgroups
header line.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

[cowardly snecked AUK restored]

What does your erroneous presupposition have to do with colored text
in DeScribe, Deco?