"brian a m stuckless" wrote in message



$$ Momentum UNcertainty varies iNVERSELY with the PATH's STRAiGHTNESS.


So space is 'fullest' where uncertainty is at a maximum.
As in a cloud. Or an emotion, or the quantum/classical
transition. Wherever behavior is both like a particle
and wave at the same time.

All of our questions are answered by seeking out and
understanding uncertainty, not in finding 'certain' equations.

For example, in the stock market when chart behavior
approaches maximum uncertainty, the investors no longer
have any tangible facts to guide them. So the behavior
detaches from reality, and follows psychology instead.
At the system dynamic state of max uncertainty, universal
behavior takes over, and the system does what we
think it will do.

Universal behavior, and hence fundamental law, can
only be derived from that delicate critical point between
chaos and order. At the edge between quantum and
classical behavior, where both fields are needed simultaneously
to fully describe the system. The one place where
our classical determinism completely fails. The one
place where quantum methods completely fail.

If we seek out and understand uncertainty, truth can
be found, and the world can become what we make it.


Jonathan


"As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not
certain, and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality."
....Albert Einstein


s














$$
$$ [ DECLARiNG "No PRiOR geometry" GR *cut off* it's own WORLD-line ].
$$
$$ ^.
$$ Any SPACE-time where STUFF is CLEARLY isN'T EMPTY.!!

$$$$$$$ $$$$$$$$ $$$$$$$ $$$$$$$

Randy Poe wrote: "PD" wrote in message:
The UP [HUP] does not forbid the simultaneous measurement of
the momentum and position of any photon, let alone the -=-

$$ Heisenberg was NOT WRONG just because he got CAUGHT, too OFTEN,
$$ trying to ((focus)) on BOTH ENDs of velocity vectors ..at ONCE.

The HUP says you can measure both position and
momentum simultaneously, to extremely high precision.
$$
$$ No. BOTH POSiTiON A and B are required ..before any MOMENTUM.
$$
$$ 41. HUP down, Higg's Boson & Planck UNcertainty.
$$ You caN'T locate HUP-point A to "ARBiTRARiLY high precision".
$$ THAT associated RADiUS is the PLANCK Length lp = hbar / Mp*c.
$$ Where, Mp is the Planck MASS; ..And, Mp*lp*c is DiRAC's hbar.
$$ Where, 4*(pi)^2*Mp = Higg's {mph}; DiRAC's hbar = {mph}*ls*c.
$$
$$ ^.
$$ Planck UNcertainty of Position A
$$ [ PRE-tunneling ..and PRE-momentum, POSiTiON A ].
$$ HUP FAiLs, for it's SCiENTiFiCALLY-iMpossible-EXACTness of A.
$$ QUANTiFY UNscientifically-CERTAiN "EXACTness" of HUP-point A.

- Randy

The Planck PRE-momentum UNcertainty of PRE-tunneling Position A.
HUP down, Higg's Boson and the Planck UNcertainty of Position A.
$$ $$ $$
"Physical EMPTiNESS, iN Between POiNTs"; by, jOE Fischer (2005).
"The PHYSiCs of EMPTiNESS, OUTside of POiNTs"; j Fischer (2006).
DiVERGENT points and physical emptiness, OUTside (BETWEEN) them.

$$ light.jpg attached.
$$ Sincerely, ```Brian A M Stuckless, Ph.T (Tivity), over.
$$ ^.
GUESS (RESTmass)*c^4=(iNTRiNSiC energy e)*c^2=(mol part)*K*Volt*meter.
$$ My GUESS iSS STANDARD
$$ The STANDARD set.
$$ /\
$$ __ _\/_ __
$$ \_\/_/\_\/_/
$$ /\_\/_/\ ("`-/")_.-'"``-._
$$ _\/_/\_\/_ \. . `; -._ )-;-, `)
$$ /_/\_\/_/\_\ \ / (v_,) _ )`-.\ ``-'
$$ /\ - O - _ .- _..-_/ / ((.'
$$ \/ / \ ((,.-' ((,/ By: Toe.!
$$ By deeds you know them.!!
BEHOLD, IAM THAT IAM hath circumcised the FORESKiNs of your hearts.!!
$$ :-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'`
$$ ____ _ _ _ _
$$ | _ \ | | ___ _ __ | | __ | | | |
$$ | |_) | | | / _ \ | '_ \ | |/ / | | | |
$$ My _ENORMOUS_ | __/ | | | (_) | | | | | | _ |_| |_|
$$ |_| |_| \___/ |_| |_| |_|\_\ (_) (_) (_)
$$
$$ :*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_
BEHOLD, IAM THAT IAM WHOLLY WHOLLY WHOLLY He ..and no more is more.!!

jOE's DiVERGENT points & the physical emptiness, outside of them.