Thread: OS/2 word processor: Describe
View Single Post
  #9  
Old March 24th 06, 01:43 AM posted to comp.os.os2.misc,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.astronomy,rec.music.classical
[email protected]
external usenet poster
  
Posts: n/a
Default OS/2 word processor: Describe
writes:

Raving Loonie wrote:

Double-A wrote:

ah wrote:

Double-A wrote:

Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote:

Martin T wrote:

off topic

Figures.

Irrelevant, given that I never said that you did say that, Tholen.
In fact, responding has never been the issue. Rather, enduring has
been the issue.

Classic evasion.

Unfortunatly his exactly like Eliza (that early computer AI inspired
software who tries, poorly, to emulate a human conversation) -- he
can't help him self -- he will never stop responding to such
conversations.

Michael Baldwin Bruce is hardly "exactly like Eliza", Törnsten.

Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Tholen?

Classic erroneous presupposition.

Someone had once an a good idea to make a Usenet version of ELIZA and
try that on him.

Anything to keep Michael Baldwin Bruce occupied and entertained.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Non sequitur.

What does this have to do with OS/2, Tholen?

That would make possible some very intresting human behavior
experiment.

As if Michael Baldwin Bruce's behavior isn't already a very interesting
experiment.

It's more of your classic evasion, Tholen.

Illogical, Tholen, and rather ironic, coming from the person who has
tholed more, using your concept of the term.

My own guess would be that Tholen would "win" (computer die before he
stops responding).

What you guess is irrelevant, T=F6rnsten.

On what basis do you speak for everybody around here, Tholen?

What you think is irrelevant, Tholen.

Touche!

Illogical, given that I didn't say anything about what I think, Bruce.

Brilliant! Just brilliant, Martin!

Illogical, given that I didn't say anything about what I think, Bruce.

You make Dickless look the fool that he is.

Who is "Dickless", Bruce? There is no such person involved in the
discussion. Still suffering from reading comprehension problems?

Thank you for posting to alt.astronomy, Dr. Tholen.

It was Michael Baldwin Bruce who chose to add that irrelevant
newsgroup to the distribution.

An update on your studies of asteroids near the Sun would always be
welcome here.

I do not subscribe to alt.astronomy.

Well, don't just re-buff the Man, Tholen!

Dr. Tholen has made many discoveries in astronomy. He would have much
to offer an astronomy group if he wanted to.

I subscribe to sci.astro, which is an astronomy group.

But it seems that when he
gets on Usenet, he just wants to fool around.

What seems to you is irrelevant, Double-A. The fact is that I don't
fool around at all. I do stand my ground against antagonists like
Michael Baldwin Bruce. It was Michael Baldwin Bruce who was doing
the fooling around, trolling in a thread about colored text in
DeScribe.

Maybe that's how he blows off steam.

Maybe not.

Trout 'tickling' ...

Key words: "He blows" !

Non sequitur.

If I wanted any lip off you, I'd wipe it off of Bruce's zipper!

What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe?