Brad Guth wrote:
GARTINsux,
MESSENGER is simply yet another wag-thy-dog and snooker-thy-humanity
worth of a mission, proving that conditional physics of photons applies
as always, as to having selectively imaged our naked Earth within such
a highly limited DR, except for the matter of fact that it should have
been easily imaged along with numerous other objects that would have
and most certainly should have been recorded within the same frame, and
thereby at the very same CCD scan/exposure, especially on behalf of
having included an honest look-see at our very own dark and nasty moon
as for MESSENGER coming back towards or upon leaving Earth on it's way
to Mercury.

Even via an exact same exposure of just taking an image of our nearby
moon all by itself, which any damn fool could then photoshop into a
side-by-side honestly undistorted and unfiltered or same color spectrum
bandpass of a look-see should have been accomplished.
-
Brad Guth

Well a couple of questions arise. You say they've "imaged" Earth,
Venus, & so on. How do we know what planet they really imaged, when
they're saying they're feeding us a picture of Venus?

How do we know that they didn't image Earth, and then tell us it was
Venus?

Do you believe personally that there is life on Venus?

Thanks,..