There is no precedence for the destruction of a discipline involved in
natural phenomena such as that which occured in astronomy,a destruction
which still prevails,partly due to the expansion of an ill-suited
method applied to astronomical principles and partly due to the
intutive atrophy which would normally recognise the validity of the
original astronomical insights and the misjudgements and carelessness
of later people.

In accepting the endeavor to call attension to exactly where the errors
were created,it took a number of years to trace it to Flamsteed and
Newton for their respective agendas.The errors can be proposed
graphically and amount to the hideous attempt to hammer Copernican
heliocentricity into a calendrically driven framework -

http://encarta.msn.com/media_4615477...real_Time.html

Shame on those who should know better while the great majority,either
through unfamiliarity or incapacity,are excused from the blame for
partaking in sidereal working principles which amount to science
fiction.

Take a good look at your sidereal system which requires 3 years of 365
days and 1 year of 366 days and then try to propose yourselves as
astronomers.Whatever you are,I assure you that you are not.